SecPortal vs ArmorCode
delivery workspace vs ASPM aggregation layer
ArmorCode is an Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform that ingests output from third-party AppSec scanners (SAST, SCA, DAST, container, IaC, secrets, cloud), correlates findings across asset records, and pushes prioritised remediation to ticketing systems. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec team needs an aggregation layer above them. SecPortal is a different shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing an ASPM aggregation layer above an AppSec scanner stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | ArmorCode |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, reports, and client portal on one tenant | Application Security Posture Management platform that aggregates output from third-party AppSec scanners |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Programme model rather than scoped engagement | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal application owner model | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules) | Imports DAST and external scanner output | |
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | Imports DAST output from third-party scanners | |
| Code scanning (SAST/SCA via Semgrep) | Imports SAST/SCA output from third-party scanners (Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep) | |
| Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery | ||
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Limited (records are scanner-derived through ingestion) | |
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | AppSec posture dashboards rather than narrative deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Vendor-mapped vulnerability records | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS plus proprietary ArmorCode risk scoring | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Many AppSec vendor connectors plus API ingestion | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Relies on third-party scanner credential storage | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure through underlying scanner | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks | Compliance dashboards mapped to ingested scanner data |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led, application-count and scanner-count licensing |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Connector configuration plus application onboarding |
| Best fit for | Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, and in-house security functions that scan, report, and deliver from one workspace | Large enterprises that already operate Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep, and similar AppSec scanners in parallel and need an aggregation layer above them |
SecPortal vs ArmorCode: delivery workspace vs ASPM aggregation layer
ArmorCode is one of the leading platforms in the Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category. The platform ingests output from third-party AppSec scanners (Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Aqua, Burp Suite, and similar), correlates findings against the application asset, deduplicates across scanner output, applies a proprietary risk score on top of CVSS, and pushes prioritised remediation campaigns into ticketing. ArmorCode assumes you already operate multiple AppSec scanners and that the bottleneck is consolidating their output into one queue.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security delivery workspace that carries the engagement, the findings, the scanning, the AI report, the branded client portal, and the invoice all on one tenant. The buyer is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that ships work to clients or stakeholders. If you are comparing an ASPM aggregation layer above a stack of existing AppSec scanner contracts to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the ASPM category often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber, SecPortal vs Kenna Security, SecPortal vs Phoenix Security and SecPortal vs Apiiro.
Where ArmorCode stops for delivery and in-house security work
These are not ArmorCode-specific criticisms; they are properties of an ASPM aggregation platform when you compare it to running scoped engagements or a scanner-plus-findings programme on a single workspace.
Built as an ASPM aggregation layer above AppSec scanners, not a delivery workspace
ArmorCode is an Application Security Posture Management platform that ingests output from third-party AppSec scanners (Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Aqua, Burp Suite, and similar), correlates findings across application records, deduplicates across scanner output, and pushes prioritised remediation campaigns into ticketing. The buyer assumption is that the AppSec scanners are already deployed and that the team needs an orchestration layer above them. SecPortal is the opposite shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
ArmorCode is organised around the application, the finding, and the remediation campaign rather than around a scoped engagement with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, a vulnerability assessment, a code review, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable, ArmorCode does not carry that record.
No native scanning of external domains, web apps, or code
ArmorCode does not run its own SAST, SCA, DAST, container, or external scan. It depends on the buyer already paying for separate Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Aqua, or Burp Suite licenses to populate the platform. SecPortal includes 16 external domain scan modules, 17 authenticated web modules, and SAST plus SCA code scanning via Semgrep on its own subscription.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
ArmorCode output lives inside the ArmorCode console. There is no white-label portal a security firm or in-house team can hand to an external client or to a stakeholder business unit under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than the vendor name.
No AI-generated executive summaries, technical writeups, or remediation narratives
ArmorCode produces AppSec posture dashboards, prioritisation views, and remediation campaign metrics from ingested scanner data, but it does not draft executive summaries, technical pentest writeups, or narrative remediation roadmaps. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record so the deliverable goes out without separate writeup time.
Sales-led procurement and scanner-count licensing
ArmorCode pricing is sales-led with licensing tied to the number of applications, the number of integrated scanners, and the number of users. The procurement cycle assumes a buyer with multiple existing AppSec scanner contracts and a budget for an aggregation layer above them. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor.
How an ASPM platform and a delivery workspace see the same problem differently
ASPM is a useful category framing, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what an aggregation layer above existing scanners gives you and what it costs. The contrast below is between an ASPM platform that derives value from scanner output it does not own and a delivery workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators run.
ASPM correlates output across scanners that the buyer already owns
The ASPM category exists to solve a problem large AppSec teams have when they run multiple SAST, SCA, DAST, container, IaC, and secrets scanners in parallel. The output is duplicated across vendors, the prioritisation is inconsistent, and the remediation campaign is split across at least three downstream ticketing tools. ArmorCode and similar ASPM platforms (Phoenix Security, Apiiro, OX Security, Cycode, Aikido) ingest the scanner output, deduplicate against the application asset, score by reachability or business criticality, and push to the ticket. The economic value comes from the scanners that already exist; the ASPM platform is the layer above them.
A delivery workspace owns the finding record from scan to closure
SecPortal does not assume that an existing AppSec scanner stack is in place. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, and an external attack surface programme. The finding lives where the work is done, not in an analytics layer above six other consoles.
The right answer depends on the existing scanner stack
If the AppSec team already owns Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep, Wiz, Aqua, and Burp Suite, and the bottleneck is correlating their output into one prioritised remediation queue, an ASPM platform is the right shape. If the team wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the audit trail to live on one workspace without licensing six other tools first, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different teams; one is the right shape for a given buyer at a given time.
Who each platform is the right fit for
ArmorCode and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether you are stitching together six existing AppSec scanner contracts or running scoped engagements and findings on one workspace.
ArmorCode fits enterprises with many AppSec scanners already in place
If you are a large internal AppSec team running Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Aqua, and Burp Suite in parallel and the bottleneck is correlating their output into one deduplicated, prioritised remediation queue piped into Jira or ServiceNow, ArmorCode was built for that orchestration shape. The buyer assumption is multiple existing AppSec scanner contracts plus the budget for an aggregation layer above them.
SecPortal fits teams who want scanning, findings, reports, and delivery in one workspace
If you are a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing you to license six other tools first.
SecPortal fits buyers who want findings to live somewhere they own
If you want every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report to live in a workspace under your brand rather than scattered across vendor consoles, ASPM dashboards, and ticketing systems, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record across vendors and across years. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners outside SecPortal are part of the picture.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor, no per-application licensing model, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal over ArmorCode
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record instead of an open-ended remediation campaign above many AppSec scanners
- Scan internally with 16 external modules, 17 authenticated modules, and SAST plus SCA code scanning rather than aggregating output from existing AppSec scanner contracts
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on your tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor console or scheduled remediation campaign email
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit
- Document CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without procurement, an application-count audit, or a sales call
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an in-house AppSec or vulnerability management programme rather than pay for an ASPM aggregation layer above existing scanner contracts, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent comparisons that come up most often.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that names the four product shapes (analytics layer, single-vendor exposure, ITSM-tied response, engagement-record workspace) and when each fits.
- Vulnerability prioritisation for the operational workflow that captures CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure into a defensible queue.
- Scanner result triage for ingesting Nessus, Burp, and CSV output into the same findings record that SAST and SCA scanners feed.
- Security tool consolidation for the operational rationale behind moving from a stack of AppSec scanner contracts plus an aggregation layer to a single delivery workspace.
- Vulnerability backlog management for the queue-level discipline that prevents AppSec findings from aging into risk debt.
- Vulnerability SLA management to set, track, and enforce remediation SLAs by severity and asset tier.
- Security findings deduplication guide for how to handle duplicate findings across SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual entry without an ASPM layer above them.
- SAST vs SCA code scanning for the AppSec scanner category breakdown that ASPM platforms aggregate above.
- Secure code review checklist for the manual AppSec workflow that lives next to scanner output on the same record.
- Findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, severity calibration, and 300+ finding templates.
- Code scanning with SAST and SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories.
- External scanning with 16 modules covering SSL, headers, ports, subdomains, and cloud exposure.
- SecPortal vs Cycode for the code-graph ASPM alternative anchored on the SCM with native SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, and container scanning.
- SecPortal vs Aikido Security for the all-in-one developer-first ASPM alternative that bundles SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, DAST, and cloud posture.
- SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber for the multi-scanner orchestration alternative buyers in the ASPM category often evaluate alongside.
- SecPortal vs Kenna Security for the RBVM analytics-layer alternative buyers consider when re-evaluating their ASPM contract.
- SecPortal vs Snyk for the underlying SAST/SCA scanner most ASPM platforms ingest from.
- SecPortal vs Veracode for the enterprise SAST scanner most ASPM platforms ingest from.
- SecPortal vs Checkmarx for the other dominant enterprise AppSec console most ASPM platforms ingest from.
- SecPortal vs GitHub Advanced Security for the GitHub-native AppSec scanner most ASPM platforms ingest from.
- SecPortal for AppSec teams for the in-house AppSec audience overview, including SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual review workflows.
- SecPortal for product security teams for the product-security audience overview, including secure-by-default and supply-chain context.
- SecPortal for vulnerability management teams for the in-house find-track-fix-verify audience overview.
Scanning, findings, AI reports, and delivery on one workspace
Run scoped engagements, hold the AppSec finding record, and ship results through a branded portal. No ASPM aggregation layer above six AppSec scanner contracts. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.