SecPortal vs Phoenix Security
delivery workspace vs risk-based ASPM orchestrator
Phoenix Security is a risk-based Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and vulnerability orchestration platform that ingests output from third-party AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies business-context prioritisation through threat intelligence and asset criticality, and routes a unified backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec or vulnerability management team needs a risk-based orchestration layer above them. SecPortal is a different shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a risk-based ASPM orchestrator above an existing scanner stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Phoenix Security |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, reports, and client portal on one tenant | Risk-based ASPM and vulnerability orchestration platform that ingests, correlates, and prioritises findings from third-party AppSec and infrastructure scanners |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Programme model rather than scoped engagement | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal application owner and asset owner model | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules) | Imports infrastructure and external scanner output | |
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | Imports DAST output from third-party scanners | |
| Code scanning (SAST/SCA via Semgrep) | Imports SAST/SCA output from third-party scanners | |
| Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery | ||
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Limited (records are scanner-derived through ingestion) | |
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | Risk-posture dashboards and remediation campaigns rather than narrative deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Vendor-mapped vulnerability records | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS plus proprietary Phoenix risk scoring with threat intelligence and business-context weighting | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Many AppSec, container, cloud, and infra scanner connectors plus API ingestion | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Relies on third-party scanner credential storage | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure through underlying scanner | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks | Compliance dashboards mapped to ingested scanner data |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led, application-count and connector-count licensing |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Connector configuration plus application onboarding plus risk-model calibration |
| Best fit for | Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, and in-house security functions that scan, report, and deliver from one workspace | Large enterprises that already operate AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners in parallel and need a risk-based orchestration layer that prioritises across them with business-context weighting |
SecPortal vs Phoenix Security: delivery workspace vs risk-based ASPM orchestrator
Phoenix Security is one of the leading platforms in the risk-based Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and vulnerability orchestration category. The platform ingests output from third-party AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies threat intelligence and business-context weighting, and routes a single prioritised backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec or vulnerability management team needs a risk-based orchestration layer above them.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security delivery workspace that carries the engagement, the findings, the scanning, the AI report, the branded client portal, and the invoice all on one tenant. The buyer is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that ships work to clients or stakeholders. If you are comparing a risk-based ASPM orchestrator above an existing scanner stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the ASPM category often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs ArmorCode, SecPortal vs Cycode, SecPortal vs Aikido, SecPortal vs Apiiro, SecPortal vs OX Security and SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber.
Where Phoenix stops for delivery and engagement work
These are not Phoenix-specific criticisms; they are properties of a risk-based ASPM orchestration layer when you compare it to running scoped engagements or a scanner-plus-findings programme on a single workspace.
Built as a risk-based ASPM orchestrator, not a delivery workspace
Phoenix Security is a risk-based Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and vulnerability orchestration platform that ingests output from third-party AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies threat intelligence and business-context weighting, and routes a single prioritised backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the team needs a risk-based orchestration layer to consolidate signal across them. SecPortal is the opposite shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
Phoenix is organised around the application asset, the contributing scanner, and the prioritised remediation campaign rather than around a scoped engagement with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, a vulnerability assessment, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable, Phoenix does not carry that record.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Phoenix output lives inside the Phoenix console. There is no white-label portal a security firm or in-house security team can hand to an external client or to a stakeholder business unit under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.
No native scanning across external, authenticated web, or code
Phoenix is an orchestration and prioritisation layer above scanners. It does not run its own external vulnerability scans, its own authenticated web testing, or its own SAST and SCA against connected repositories. The buyer is expected to license those scanners separately and ingest their output. SecPortal runs 16 external scanner modules, 17 authenticated web scanner modules, and SAST plus SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories on the same workspace as findings, reports, and delivery.
No AI-generated executive summaries, technical writeups, or remediation narratives
Phoenix produces risk-posture dashboards, prioritisation views, and remediation campaign tracking, but it does not draft executive summaries, technical pentest writeups, or narrative remediation roadmaps that go to a board, an auditor, or an external client. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record so the deliverable goes out without separate writeup time.
Sales-led pricing tied to applications, connectors, and seats
Phoenix pricing is sales-led and typically licensed by application count, connector count, and seats, with a contract floor that fits enterprise procurement rather than self-service onboarding. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.
How a risk-based ASPM orchestrator and a delivery workspace see the same problem differently
Risk-based ASPM is a useful category framing, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what an orchestration layer above many scanner contracts gives you and what it costs. The contrast below is between an ASPM platform that derives value from correlating and prioritising signal across many separately licensed scanners and a delivery workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators run.
Risk-based ASPM orchestrators consolidate signal across an existing scanner stack
Phoenix Security and similar risk-based ASPM orchestrators (ArmorCode for connector-aggregator scope, Vulcan Cyber for cyber-risk-based prioritisation, Apiiro for code-to-runtime context, Brinqa for risk analytics) start from the assumption that the AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners are already in place. The economic value comes from correlating output across many scanners, applying business-context weighting like asset criticality and threat intelligence, and routing a single prioritised backlog to engineering. The platform is the orchestration layer that sits above a stack of scanner contracts.
A delivery workspace owns the finding record from scan to closure
SecPortal does not assume that a risk-based orchestration layer above many separate scanner contracts is the right shape for the work. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, and an external attack surface programme. The finding lives where the work is done, not in an orchestration console that ends at the prioritised backlog.
The right answer depends on whether scanners are already in place or need to be the platform
If the AppSec or vulnerability management team has already licensed Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, Semgrep, and several others in parallel, has thousands of findings spread across them, and the bottleneck is consolidating that signal into one prioritised remediation backlog with business-context weighting, a risk-based ASPM orchestrator like Phoenix is the right shape. If the team needs the scanners themselves, the engagement record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice on one workspace without a stack of separate scanner contracts, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different teams; one is the right shape for a given buyer at a given time.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Phoenix and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether you are correlating output across an existing scanner stack with business-context risk weighting or running scoped engagements and findings on one workspace.
Phoenix fits large enterprises with an existing AppSec and infrastructure scanner stack
If you are a large enterprise, the AppSec and vulnerability management teams operate Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, container scanners, and cloud posture tools in parallel, the asset surface is hundreds or thousands of applications, and the bottleneck is consolidating findings across that stack into one risk-based backlog with threat-intelligence and asset-criticality weighting, Phoenix Security was built for that orchestration shape. The buyer assumption is one orchestration layer that sits above the scanner stack and routes a unified backlog to engineering.
SecPortal fits teams who want scanning, findings, reports, and delivery in one workspace
If you are a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing the team to license separate scanners and ingest their output through an orchestration layer.
SecPortal fits buyers who deliver findings to clients, stakeholders, or auditors
If you ship reports to external clients, business unit owners, or auditors, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download has to live under your brand rather than under a vendor console, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners outside SecPortal are part of the picture, alongside SecPortal native external, authenticated, and code scanning.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor on the Pro or Team tiers, no per-application licensing model, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal over Phoenix Security
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record instead of an open-ended risk-based backlog across many scanner contracts
- Scan internally with 16 external modules, 17 authenticated modules, and SAST plus SCA code scanning rather than relying on an orchestration layer above a stack of separately licensed scanners
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on your tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor risk-posture console
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit
- Document CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without a sales call, an application-count audit, or a connector-count audit
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an in-house AppSec or vulnerability management programme rather than pay for a risk-based ASPM orchestrator above many scanner contracts, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent comparisons that come up most often.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that names the four product shapes (analytics layer, single-vendor exposure, ITSM-tied response, engagement-record workspace) and when each fits.
- Vulnerability prioritisation for the operational workflow that captures CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure into a defensible queue.
- Scanner result triage for ingesting Nessus, Burp, and CSV output into the same findings record that SecPortal native scanners feed.
- Security tool consolidation for the operational rationale behind moving from a stack of AppSec scanner contracts plus an orchestration layer to a single delivery workspace.
- Scanner-to-ticket handoff governance for the routing-layer discipline between scanner output and engineering tickets that risk-based orchestrators promise to automate.
- Vulnerability backlog management for the queue-level discipline that prevents AppSec and infrastructure findings from aging into risk debt.
- Security tool coverage overlap for the catalogue-level coverage matrix across SAST, SCA, DAST, container, IaC, secrets, ASM, pentest, and bug bounty that ASPM orchestrators consolidate.
- Security findings deduplication guide for how to handle duplicate findings across SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual entry without depending on one orchestration vendor.
- Vulnerability management programme maturity model for the maturity scaffold that frames whether a risk-based ASPM orchestrator is the next investment or a delivery workspace would be more load-bearing.
- Findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, severity calibration, and 300+ finding templates.
- External scanning with 16 modules covering SSL, headers, ports, subdomains, and cloud exposure.
- Code scanning with SAST and SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories.
- SecPortal vs ArmorCode for the connector-aggregator ASPM alternative that ingests from existing AppSec scanner contracts.
- SecPortal vs Cycode for the code-graph ASPM alternative anchored on the SCM with native SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, and container scanning.
- SecPortal vs Aikido for the all-in-one developer-first ASPM alternative that bundles SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, DAST, and cloud posture.
- SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber for the cyber-risk-based vulnerability orchestration alternative that consolidates infrastructure and AppSec scanner output.
- SecPortal vs Kenna Security for the predictive-risk-scoring vulnerability orchestration alternative now part of Cisco Vulnerability Management.
- SecPortal for AppSec teams for the in-house AppSec audience overview, including SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual review workflows.
- SecPortal for vulnerability management teams for the VM-team audience overview, including SLA, exception, and backlog discipline on the same record as scanning.
- SecPortal for CISOs for the security-leadership audience overview, including reporting, evidence retention, and programme maturity context.
Scanning, findings, AI reports, and delivery on one workspace
Run scoped engagements, hold the AppSec and vulnerability finding record, and ship results through a branded portal. No risk-based ASPM orchestrator above many separate scanner contracts. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.