SecPortal vs Apiiro
delivery workspace vs code-to-runtime ASPM
Apiiro is a code-to-runtime Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform that maps the application risk graph from source code through dependencies, contributors, pipeline, and deployment, ingests output from third-party SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, and runtime scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies code-context and runtime-context risk weighting (reachability, exposure, business criticality), and routes a unified backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec or product security team needs a code-to-runtime correlation layer above them. SecPortal is a different shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a code-to-runtime ASPM above an existing scanner stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Apiiro |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, reports, and client portal on one tenant | Code-to-runtime ASPM that maps the application risk graph from source through deployment and correlates findings from third-party AppSec, container, cloud, and runtime scanners |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Application and risk-graph model rather than scoped engagement | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal application owner and code owner model | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules) | ||
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | Imports DAST output from third-party scanners | |
| Code scanning (SAST/SCA via Semgrep) | Native code analysis paired with imports from third-party SAST/SCA scanners | |
| Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery | ||
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Limited (records are scanner-derived through ingestion and the application risk graph) | |
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | Risk-graph dashboards and remediation campaigns rather than narrative deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Vendor-mapped vulnerability records with code-context annotation | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS plus proprietary Apiiro risk scoring with code-to-runtime context weighting | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Many AppSec, container, cloud, and runtime scanner connectors plus API ingestion | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Relies on third-party scanner credential storage | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure through underlying scanner | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks | Compliance dashboards mapped to ingested scanner data and code-context signal |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led, repository-count, application-count, and contributor-count licensing |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Connector configuration plus repository onboarding plus risk-graph calibration |
| Best fit for | Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, and in-house security functions that scan, report, and deliver from one workspace | Large enterprises that already operate AppSec, container, cloud, and runtime scanners in parallel and need a code-to-runtime correlation layer that maps the application risk graph and prioritises across them with reachability and runtime context |
SecPortal vs Apiiro: delivery workspace vs code-to-runtime ASPM
Apiiro is one of the leading platforms in the code-to-runtime Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category. The platform maps the application risk graph from source code through dependencies, contributors, pipeline, and deployment, ingests output from third-party SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, and runtime scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies code-context and runtime-context weighting (reachability, exposure, business criticality), and routes a single prioritised backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec or product security team needs a code-to-runtime correlation layer above them.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security delivery workspace that carries the engagement, the findings, the scanning, the AI report, the branded client portal, and the invoice all on one tenant. The buyer is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that ships work to clients or stakeholders. If you are comparing a code-to-runtime ASPM above an existing scanner stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the ASPM category often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs ArmorCode, SecPortal vs Cycode, SecPortal vs Phoenix Security, SecPortal vs OX Security and SecPortal vs Aikido.
Where Apiiro stops for delivery and engagement work
These are not Apiiro-specific criticisms; they are properties of a code-to-runtime ASPM correlation layer when you compare it to running scoped engagements or a scanner-plus-findings programme on a single workspace.
Built as a code-to-runtime ASPM, not a delivery workspace
Apiiro is a code-to-runtime Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform that maps the application risk graph from source code through dependencies, contributors, pipeline, and deployment, ingests output from third-party SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, and runtime scanners, correlates findings against application and asset records, applies code-context and runtime-context risk weighting, and routes a unified backlog to engineering owners. The buyer assumption is that the scanners are already deployed and the AppSec or product security team needs a code-to-runtime correlation layer above them. SecPortal is the opposite shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
Apiiro is organised around the application risk graph, the contributing scanner, and the prioritised remediation campaign rather than around a scoped engagement with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, a vulnerability assessment, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable, Apiiro does not carry that record.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Apiiro output lives inside the Apiiro console. There is no white-label portal a security firm or in-house security team can hand to an external client or to a stakeholder business unit under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.
No native external, authenticated web, or end-to-end DAST scanning
Apiiro is a code-to-runtime correlation layer above scanners. The platform reads code repositories and pipelines, ingests dependency and container manifests, and correlates against runtime asset signal, but it does not run its own external vulnerability scans across an internet-facing perimeter or its own authenticated web testing across a logged-in application. The buyer is expected to license those scanners separately and ingest their output. SecPortal runs 16 external scanner modules, 17 authenticated web scanner modules, and SAST plus SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories on the same workspace as findings, reports, and delivery.
No AI-generated executive summaries, technical writeups, or remediation narratives
Apiiro produces application risk dashboards, code-to-runtime context views, prioritisation lists, and remediation campaign tracking, but it does not draft executive summaries, technical pentest writeups, or narrative remediation roadmaps that go to a board, an auditor, or an external client. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record so the deliverable goes out without separate writeup time.
Sales-led pricing tied to repositories, applications, and contributors
Apiiro pricing is sales-led and typically licensed by repository count, application count, contributor count, and connector count, with a contract floor that fits enterprise procurement rather than self-service onboarding. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.
How a code-to-runtime ASPM and a delivery workspace see the same problem differently
Code-to-runtime ASPM is a useful category framing, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what a correlation layer above many scanner contracts gives you and what it costs. The contrast below is between an ASPM platform that derives value from mapping the application risk graph across many separately licensed scanners and a delivery workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators run.
Code-to-runtime ASPM platforms map the application risk graph above an existing scanner stack
Apiiro and similar code-to-runtime ASPM platforms (ArmorCode for connector-aggregator scope, Cycode for code-graph SCM-anchored scanning, Phoenix Security for risk-based orchestration with threat intelligence, Aikido for all-in-one developer-first bundling, Endor Labs for SCA and reachability analysis) start from the assumption that the AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanners are already in place. The economic value comes from correlating output across many scanners against an application risk graph that includes code structure, contributor signal, dependency reachability, pipeline events, and deployment context, then routing a single prioritised backlog to engineering. The platform is the correlation layer that sits above a stack of scanner contracts.
A delivery workspace owns the finding record from scan to closure
SecPortal does not assume that a code-to-runtime correlation layer above many separate scanner contracts is the right shape for the work. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, and an external attack surface programme. The finding lives where the work is done, not in a correlation console that ends at the prioritised backlog.
The right answer depends on whether scanners are already in place or need to be the platform
If the AppSec or product security team has already licensed Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, container scanners, and several others in parallel, has thousands of findings spread across them, and the bottleneck is correlating that signal into one prioritised remediation backlog with code-to-runtime context, a code-to-runtime ASPM like Apiiro is the right shape. If the team needs the scanners themselves, the engagement record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice on one workspace without a stack of separate scanner contracts, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different teams; one is the right shape for a given buyer at a given time.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Apiiro and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether you are correlating output across an existing scanner stack with a code-to-runtime risk graph or running scoped engagements and findings on one workspace.
Apiiro fits large enterprises with an existing AppSec and infrastructure scanner stack
If you are a large enterprise, the AppSec and product security teams operate Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, container scanners, and cloud posture tools in parallel, the asset surface is hundreds or thousands of applications and microservices, and the bottleneck is correlating findings across that stack into one risk-graph-weighted backlog with code-to-runtime context, Apiiro was built for that correlation shape. The buyer assumption is one correlation layer that sits above the scanner stack and routes a unified backlog to engineering through a code-to-runtime risk graph.
SecPortal fits teams who want scanning, findings, reports, and delivery in one workspace
If you are a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, or an in-house security function that wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing the team to license separate scanners and ingest their output through a code-to-runtime correlation layer.
SecPortal fits buyers who deliver findings to clients, stakeholders, or auditors
If you ship reports to external clients, business unit owners, or auditors, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download has to live under your brand rather than under a vendor console, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners outside SecPortal are part of the picture, alongside SecPortal native external, authenticated, and code scanning.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor on the Pro or Team tiers, no per-repository licensing model, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal over Apiiro
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record instead of an open-ended risk-graph backlog above many scanner contracts
- Scan internally with 16 external modules, 17 authenticated modules, and SAST plus SCA code scanning rather than relying on a code-to-runtime correlation layer above a stack of separately licensed scanners
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on your tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor risk-graph console
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit
- Document CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without a repository-count audit, an application-count audit, or a sales call for the higher tier
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an in-house AppSec or vulnerability management programme rather than pay for a code-to-runtime ASPM correlation layer above many scanner contracts, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent comparisons that come up most often.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that names the four product shapes (analytics layer, single-vendor exposure, ITSM-tied response, engagement-record workspace) and when each fits.
- Vulnerability prioritisation for the operational workflow that captures CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure into a defensible queue.
- Scanner result triage for ingesting Nessus, Burp, and CSV output into the same findings record that SecPortal native scanners feed.
- Security tool consolidation for the operational rationale behind moving from a stack of AppSec scanner contracts plus a correlation layer to a single delivery workspace.
- Scanner-to-ticket handoff governance for the routing-layer discipline between scanner output and engineering tickets that code-to-runtime ASPM platforms promise to automate.
- SDLC vulnerability handoff for the lifecycle-layer routing across SDLC stage gates that an application risk graph implicitly assumes but rarely operationalises end-to-end.
- Security tool coverage overlap for the catalogue-level coverage matrix across SAST, SCA, DAST, container, IaC, secrets, ASM, pentest, and bug bounty that ASPM platforms correlate.
- Vulnerability management programme maturity model for the maturity scaffold that frames whether a code-to-runtime ASPM is the next investment or a delivery workspace would be more load-bearing.
- Security debt economics for the financial-and-operational accounting view of a vulnerability programme that ASPM correlation reduces but does not eliminate.
- SAST vs SCA code scanning for the foundational distinction between code-pattern analysis and dependency vulnerability matching that ASPM platforms assume the buyer already understands.
- Findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, severity calibration, and 300+ finding templates.
- Code scanning with SAST and SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories.
- Repository connections for OAuth-backed connections to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps that gate code scanning at the workspace level.
- External scanning with 16 modules covering SSL, headers, ports, subdomains, and cloud exposure.
- SecPortal vs ArmorCode for the connector-aggregator ASPM alternative that ingests from existing AppSec scanner contracts.
- SecPortal vs Cycode for the code-graph ASPM alternative anchored on the SCM with native SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, and container scanning.
- SecPortal vs Phoenix Security for the risk-based ASPM orchestrator alternative that applies threat intelligence and business-context weighting across an existing scanner stack.
- SecPortal vs Aikido for the all-in-one developer-first ASPM alternative that bundles SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, container, DAST, and cloud posture.
- SecPortal vs Checkmarx for the enterprise AppSec console comparison covering SAST, SCA, IaC, container, and API security that ASPM platforms ingest from.
- SecPortal for AppSec teams for the in-house AppSec audience overview, including SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual review workflows.
- SecPortal for product security teams for the cross-cutting product-security audience overview, including PSIRT intake, threat-model handoff, and code-review-to-DAST routing.
- SecPortal for CISOs for the security-leadership audience overview, including reporting, evidence retention, and programme maturity context.
Scanning, findings, AI reports, and delivery on one workspace
Run scoped engagements, hold the AppSec and vulnerability finding record, and ship results through a branded portal. No code-to-runtime ASPM above many separate scanner contracts. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.