SecPortal vs Checkmarx
enterprise AppSec console vs delivery workspace
Checkmarx One is one of the dominant enterprise application security platforms, with SAST, SCA, IaC scanning, container security, API security, and supply chain risk on a portfolio-wide console aimed at enterprise AppSec teams that own a large application estate. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, native external and authenticated web scanning, and SAST plus SCA on connected repositories all live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a portfolio-wide enterprise AppSec console to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, and client portal on one tenant | Enterprise application security console covering SAST, SCA, IaC, container, API, and supply chain risk across a portfolio |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Application portfolio model rather than scoped engagement | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal application owner and developer model | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| SAST scanning | Semgrep-powered, multi-language | Checkmarx SAST |
| Software composition analysis (SCA) | Dependency analysis through Semgrep | Checkmarx SCA with reachability and exploitable-path analysis |
| Infrastructure as code (IaC) scanning | Checkmarx IaC Security (formerly KICS) | |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Checkmarx Container Security | |
| API security analysis | Authenticated DAST coverage of API endpoints | Checkmarx API Security |
| Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules) | ||
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | ||
| Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery | ||
| Repository OAuth (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) | Native repository connectors and CI/CD integrations | |
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Limited (records originate from Checkmarx scanner output) | |
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | Console dashboards and posture views rather than narrative deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Vendor-mapped vulnerability records with developer remediation guidance | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS plus Checkmarx severity model | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Imports limited to Checkmarx-native and integrated tooling | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Credential management for connected source and CI/CD systems | |
| Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) | CI/CD-driven and scheduled scanning | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure through the next pipeline run | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks | Compliance reports across OWASP, PCI DSS, NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, and similar |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led, application-count and module-based licensing with annual commitment |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Application onboarding plus repository and CI/CD integration plus AppSec policy configuration |
| Best fit for | AppSec teams, internal security teams, product security teams, vulnerability management teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that scan, report, and deliver from one workspace | Enterprise AppSec teams that own a large application portfolio across many development teams and need a portfolio-wide source-side console |
SecPortal vs Checkmarx: enterprise AppSec console vs delivery workspace
Checkmarx One is one of the dominant enterprise application security platforms. The product covers SAST through Checkmarx SAST, software composition analysis through Checkmarx SCA, infrastructure as code scanning through Checkmarx IaC Security (formerly KICS), container and Kubernetes security through Checkmarx Container Security, API security posture through Checkmarx API Security, and supply chain risk through Checkmarx SCS. The buyer assumption is that the enterprise owns a large application portfolio across many development teams and needs an AppSec console that holds the portfolio-wide source-side picture, routes remediation back to developers, and reports posture to AppSec and security leadership.
SecPortal is a different shape. SecPortal is the security delivery and findings workspace for AppSec teams, internal security functions, vulnerability management teams, product security teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that run scoped engagements and ship findings to application owners, business stakeholders, or external clients. The engagement, the scoping, the SAST and SCA output from connected repositories, the authenticated DAST and external perimeter scans, the manual findings, the AI-generated report, the branded client portal, the retest, and the invoice all sit inside one workspace. If the question is whether to scan an application portfolio continuously across an enterprise estate or to deliver assessments and findings as a recurring deliverable, this page is the side-by-side.
Where the enterprise AppSec console model stops for delivery work
These are not Checkmarx-specific criticisms; they are properties of an enterprise AppSec console when the buyer compares it to running scoped client engagements or shipping engagement deliverables to internal application owners on a platform built for delivery.
Built around the application portfolio, not the engagement record
Checkmarx One organises work around an enterprise application portfolio. Each application carries a SAST baseline, an SCA dependency tree, an IaC posture, a container scan history, and a developer-routed remediation queue. There is no concept of a scoped engagement that opens with a kickoff, runs against a defined target list, ships a final report under a client name, schedules a retest, and closes with an invoice. AppSec teams, internal security functions, and consultancies that hand findings to a stakeholder under a deliverable contract have to model that lifecycle outside Checkmarx.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Checkmarx findings are reviewed inside the Checkmarx One console or routed to developer tools. Sharing them with an application owner, a business stakeholder, or an external client typically means a Checkmarx report PDF, a CSV export, or a Jira-side ticket. SecPortal ships a white-label client portal on your tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your firm or team name rather than a vendor console.
No engagement-shaped AI-generated narrative reports
Checkmarx surfaces SAST, SCA, IaC, container, and API findings inside the console with a vulnerability profile, a CWE reference, a remediation suggestion, and an executive dashboard. It does not generate engagement-shaped executive summaries, narrative technical writeups, or remediation roadmaps from a scoped finding set on demand. SecPortal uses Claude to draft those deliverables from the live engagement findings, including CVSS vectors, evidence, and severity, so the team edits a draft rather than starting from a blank page.
No external perimeter or authenticated DAST inside the same workspace
Checkmarx One covers the source side of the application: SAST, SCA, IaC, container, and API security from a static and definition-driven perspective. It does not run external perimeter scanning across DNS, ports, SSL, headers, subdomains, and technology fingerprinting, and it does not run authenticated DAST behind stored credentials in the same workspace as the SAST output. Engagements that combine source-side analysis with running-application testing need a separate DAST and a separate external scanner. SecPortal runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep, external scanning across 16 modules, and authenticated DAST behind cookie, bearer, basic, or form authentication on the same engagement record.
No manual finding entry for non-scanner output
Checkmarx is a scanner suite. Findings appear in the workspace because a Checkmarx engine detected them. A pentest, a manual code review, or a threat-modelling output also produces findings the scanner cannot reach: business logic flaws, chained exploits, manual SSRF or IDOR proofs, authentication bypasses through application-specific state, design-level weaknesses. SecPortal ships a full manual finding editor with the 300+ finding template library, CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring, and structured evidence so non-scanner findings live on the same record as scanner output.
Sales-led procurement and enterprise commercial model
Checkmarx One pricing is custom and sales-led, typically based on the application count, the developer count, and the modules in scope (SAST, SCA, IaC, container, API). There is no public price page, no monthly self-serve tier, and no free starting point for a small team or a single engagement. SecPortal pricing is transparent on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no minimum commitment.
What SecPortal adds to the picture
Engagement-shaped workflow
Every scan, manual finding, retest, AI report, and invoice sits inside an engagement that has a client or stakeholder, a scope, a status, and a delivery date. The model matches the way internal AppSec teams run scoped application reviews for an application owner, the way consultancies deliver scoped assessments to clients, and the way pentest firms ship findings under a deliverable contract.
AI report generation
Generate executive summaries, full technical reports, remediation roadmaps, and compliance summaries from the engagement findings with a single click. The AI uses the workspace context: engagement scope, findings, severities, CVSS vectors, and evidence. The report becomes a draft the team edits rather than a blank page.
White-label client portal
Every workspace gets a branded client portal on its own tenant subdomain. Application owners, business stakeholders, or external clients log in to review findings, track remediation, download reports, and communicate with the team under your brand. Sharing findings does not mean exporting and emailing a CSV.
Source-side scanning paired with running-app and perimeter scanning on one workspace
SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep run against repositories connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth. External perimeter scanning runs across 16 modules covering SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation. Authenticated DAST runs behind stored credentials through cookie, bearer, basic, or form-based authentication. One workspace covers the source, the running application, and the perimeter rather than three consoles and three credential vaults.
300+ finding templates with calibrated severity
A finding template library covers the recurring vulnerability classes a SAST, DAST, or manual reviewer produces: injection, access control, cryptography, configuration, authentication, business logic. Templates carry CVSS 3.1 vectors and remediation guidance so the analyst edits the proof rather than rewriting the description. Severity comes from CVSS vector parsing, not from a fixed table.
Continuous monitoring inside the engagement record
Continuous monitoring schedules (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) run scans against verified domains and authenticated targets on the same record as the manual findings, the AI report, and the retest. Continuous coverage sits inside the engagement workflow rather than on a separate console.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Checkmarx One and SecPortal solve adjacent problems for different buyer shapes. The honest framing is that the right tool depends on whether the primary motion is portfolio-wide source-side coverage of an enterprise application estate or shipping engagement deliverables to clients, application owners, or business stakeholders.
Checkmarx One fits enterprise AppSec programmes that own a large application portfolio
If you are an enterprise AppSec or product security team that owns hundreds or thousands of applications, runs SAST, SCA, IaC, container, and API security as part of an SDLC programme, routes remediation to developer teams through native Jira and CI/CD integrations, and operates with an enterprise procurement and security architecture model, Checkmarx One is built for that shape of work. The buyer is the AppSec leader; the user is the AppSec analyst and the application developer.
SecPortal fits AppSec, internal security, and consultancy teams that ship findings as a deliverable
If you are an AppSec team running scoped reviews against named applications, an internal security team running scoped assessment cycles for application owners, a consultancy delivering AppSec or pentest engagements to clients, or an MSSP shipping AppSec output to subscribers, SecPortal is the delivery workspace. Engagement, findings, source-side scanning, perimeter scanning, authenticated DAST, AI reports, branded portal, and invoicing all live on one tenant.
When the answer is both
A team that runs Checkmarx as the enterprise SAST and SCA platform across the portfolio and also delivers scoped assessments to application owners, business stakeholders, or external customers can use Checkmarx for the portfolio-wide source-side coverage and SecPortal for the scoped delivery and reporting work. The two are adjacent: the question is whether the primary motion this year is portfolio-wide source-side coverage of an enterprise application estate or shipping engagement deliverables.
How SecPortal source-side scanning compares to Checkmarx source-side scanning
Checkmarx covers source-side application security with depth: a multi-language SAST engine, a managed SCA database with reachability and exploitable-path analysis, an IaC scanner derived from KICS, a container scanner, an API security analyser, and a supply chain risk module. SecPortal covers the same source-side surface as one of three lanes that converge on a single engagement record, rather than as the centrepiece of an enterprise AppSec console.
The code scanning feature runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against a repository connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth. The external scanning feature runs 16 modules across SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation so the perimeter is scanned alongside the source. The authenticated scanning feature adds DAST behind stored credentials through cookie, bearer, basic, or form authentication so issues that only surface inside an authenticated session do not slip past anonymous scanning. The continuous monitoring feature runs daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly scans on a schedule and writes the results back to the same engagement record.
How credentials and code-source authorisation are handled
Source-side scanning needs read access to a repository. SecPortal connects to GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket through OAuth so scope is bound to the connected organisation and the repositories the team selects, rather than through a shared service account or a long-lived deploy key. Authenticated scanning needs credentials that live somewhere durable. SecPortal stores them in an encrypted credential vault with AES-256-GCM, scoped to a verified domain. Every external scan is gated on domain verification through DNS TXT or meta tag so authorisation is provable before any module fires. The same pattern applies to authenticated scans: credentials and target must match the verified domain, and the scan-guard codes (DOMAIN_NOT_VERIFIED, CREDENTIAL_DOMAIN_MISMATCH, AUTH_NOT_ALLOWED) refuse to run when the chain of evidence does not hold.
Why AppSec and delivery teams pick SecPortal over an enterprise AppSec console
- Move from a portfolio-shaped enterprise AppSec console to a workspace that holds engagements, scoped findings, AI reports, retests, and a branded portal on one record
- Generate executive summaries, technical writeups, and remediation roadmaps from engagement findings rather than writing them outside the platform after every scan cycle
- Hand application owners, business stakeholders, or clients a branded portal on your subdomain instead of console exports or Jira-side tickets
- Bring external perimeter scanning and authenticated DAST into the same workspace as SAST and SCA instead of stitching together three scanner consoles and three credential vaults
- Capture manual findings (business logic, chained proofs, IDOR walkthroughs, authentication bypasses, design-level weaknesses) alongside scanner output rather than tracking them in a side document
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit rather than relying on the next scan cycle to confirm the fix
- Map findings across 21 frameworks including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP SAMM, NIST SSDF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, and FedRAMP from one workspace
- Bill the engagement from the same platform with Stripe Connect rather than running invoicing in a separate accounting tool
- Start on a free plan and pay for the seats and storage you actually use rather than committing to an enterprise application-count licence up front
From scan to deliverable
The output of a SAST run is the beginning of a deliverable, not the end. SecPortal turns scan results into draft findings, the analyst triages and validates them, the findings management layer holds the consolidated record with CVSS vectors, evidence, and remediation, and the AI reports feature generates the executive and technical narrative the recipient receives. The branded client portal is where the deliverable lands; the scanner result triage workflow covers how raw scanner output becomes a calibrated finding before it is promoted onto the canonical record.
For AppSec teams that want the per-finding evidence pack to live with the finding so the developer can reproduce and fix without scheduling a meeting, the security finding evidence package for developers workflow documents the per-finding contract. For internal security teams that already run a SAST or SCA platform and want to operationalise the output into engagement records and remediation tracking, the SDLC vulnerability handoff workflow and the remediation tracking workflow cover how source-side findings move from detection to closure with named owners, SLA tiers, and an audit trail. The importing third-party scanner results guide documents the verified Nessus, Burp Suite, and CSV import paths if the team wants to keep its existing scanner and consolidate findings on the SecPortal record.
For internal AppSec teams comparing source-side platforms
SecPortal is honest about scope. Checkmarx One is the larger source-side platform across the SAST, SCA, IaC, container, and API security surface. SecPortal does not aim to replace a portfolio-wide enterprise AppSec console across thousands of applications and many development teams. SecPortal aims to be the workspace where scoped AppSec engagements happen: the application is identified, the source is connected, the SAST and SCA scans run, the manual review findings are entered, the authenticated DAST and external scans run on the running application and perimeter, the AI report is generated, the application owner reads it through a branded portal, the remediation is tracked, and the retest closes the record. AppSec teams considering Checkmarx for portfolio-wide coverage and SecPortal for scoped delivery commonly run both in parallel rather than choosing one to replace the other. Reading the AppSec teams page and the internal security teams page helps frame which buyer shape SecPortal is designed for.
Adjacent comparisons
If the evaluation is between Checkmarx and other source-side AppSec platforms, application security platforms, or delivery workspaces, the comparisons below cover the same buying decision from different angles.
- SecPortal vs Veracode for the other dominant enterprise AppSec platform comparison.
- SecPortal vs Snyk for the developer-tool, multi-source SCA comparison.
- SecPortal vs Semgrep for the open-source SAST engine comparison (Semgrep powers SecPortal SAST).
- SecPortal vs GitHub Advanced Security for the GitHub-native code security comparison.
- SecPortal vs Aikido for the AppSec aggregator comparison.
- SecPortal vs Cycode for the ASPM comparison from the AppSec posture angle.
- SecPortal vs SonarQube for the code-quality console with security rules comparison.
- SecPortal vs Invicti for the enterprise DAST console comparison from the running-application angle.
When the work is scoped delivery, not portfolio-wide source-side coverage
Run scoped AppSec engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. SAST plus SCA plus DAST plus external scanning live on the same engagement record. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.