SecPortal vs Seemplicity
delivery workspace vs remediation orchestration platform
Seemplicity is a remediation operations platform that positions itself in the Risk Reduction as a Service category. The mechanic is to ingest output from third-party AppSec, infrastructure, cloud, and container scanners, aggregate and deduplicate findings across them, group related findings into remediation actions, route those actions to the responsible engineering owner inside the existing ticketing stack (Jira, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps), and track the remediation campaign through to closure. The buyer assumption is that the scanners and the ticketing system are already in place and the AppSec or vulnerability management team needs an orchestration layer that turns scanner output into routed, owned, time-bound remediation work. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a remediation orchestration layer above an existing scanner-and-ticketing stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Seemplicity |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, branded client portal, and engagement record on one tenant | Remediation operations platform that aggregates findings from third-party scanners, groups them into remediation actions, and routes work into the existing ticketing stack |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Continuous remediation campaign and SLA model rather than scoped engagement with a kickoff and a deliverable | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal asset owner, application owner, and engineering owner model rather than external client onboarding | |
| Branded white-label client portal on a tenant subdomain | ||
| Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules: SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, CVE correlation) | Ingests external scanner output rather than running scans natively | |
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST, 17 modules) | Ingests DAST output from third-party scanners | |
| Code scanning (SAST and SCA via Semgrep) | Ingests SAST and SCA output from third-party scanners (Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep) | |
| Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery | ||
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Records are scanner-derived through ingestion connectors rather than entered by a tester or reviewer | |
| AI-powered narrative report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | Remediation campaign dashboards and operations reports rather than engagement-shaped executive, technical, and remediation deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Vendor-mapped vulnerability records grouped into remediation actions with guidance derived from the source scanner | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS plus business-context risk weighting feeding the remediation action prioritisation | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Catalogue of AppSec, infrastructure, cloud, and container scanner connectors with bidirectional integration | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Relies on third-party scanner credential storage | |
| Aggregation and deduplication across multiple scanner sources | Findings de-duplicate inside the engagement record; bulk import supports cross-scanner consolidation | Core mechanic; cross-scanner aggregation and deduplication are the primary value drivers |
| Remediation action grouping across related findings | Findings carry shared remediation guidance and link through the engagement record; manual remediation campaign management is a separate workflow | Core mechanic; related findings collapse into a single remediation action routed to the responsible owner |
| Native ticketing routing into Jira, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps | Core mechanic; remediation actions are pushed into the existing ticketing stack and tracked through to closure | |
| Bidirectional sync with ticketing for closure validation | Closure state in the ticket flows back into the remediation action record | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Closure validation runs through the next scanner cycle that surfaces or fails to re-surface the finding rather than a tester-driven retest paired to the original record | |
| Exception register with eight-field decision chain | Per-remediation-action exception and risk acceptance scoped to the routed work item | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight | Compliance reporting derived from scanner output coverage and remediation campaign progress |
| Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) | Continuous ingestion from connected scanners and ticketing systems rather than scheduled scans against named targets | |
| Scan-to-scan diff and change-event generation across scheduled runs | Cross-scan delta is computed at the aggregated finding and remediation-action level inside the orchestration layer | |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments for engagements | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs inside the Seemplicity console | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | Sales-led commercial pricing rather than a published free tier | |
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led with annual commitment and asset-count or connector-count weighting |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Scanner connector configuration plus ticketing integration plus owner-routing rule design plus baseline learning window |
| Best fit for | AppSec teams, internal security teams, vulnerability management teams, product security teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that want scanning, findings, AI reports, branded portal, and the engagement record on one workspace | Mid-market and enterprise AppSec, product security, and vulnerability management teams that already operate a stack of third-party scanners and a mature ticketing system and want an orchestration layer above them that routes deduplicated remediation actions to owners and tracks campaigns through to closure |
SecPortal vs Seemplicity: delivery workspace vs remediation orchestration platform
Seemplicity is a remediation operations platform that positions itself in the Risk Reduction as a Service category. The mechanic is to ingest output from third-party AppSec, infrastructure, cloud, and container scanners, aggregate and deduplicate findings across them, group related findings into remediation actions, and route those actions to the responsible engineering owner inside the existing ticketing stack (Jira, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps). The buyer assumption is that the scanners and the ticketing system are already in place and the AppSec or vulnerability management team needs an orchestration layer that turns scanner output into routed, owned, time-bound remediation work.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security delivery workspace that carries the engagement, the findings, the scanning, the AI report, the branded client portal, and the invoice all on one tenant. The buyer is an AppSec team, a product security team, a vulnerability management team, an internal security team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a consultancy that ships work to clients, business units, or auditors. If you are comparing a remediation orchestration layer above an existing scanner-and-ticketing stack to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the remediation orchestration and risk-based vulnerability management categories often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs Phoenix Security, SecPortal vs ArmorCode, SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber, SecPortal vs Kenna Security, SecPortal vs Nucleus Security and SecPortal vs Brinqa.
Where Seemplicity stops for delivery and engagement work
These are not Seemplicity-specific criticisms; they are properties of a remediation orchestration layer when you compare it to running scoped engagements or a scanner-plus-findings programme on a single workspace.
Built as a remediation orchestration layer, not a delivery workspace
Seemplicity is a remediation operations platform in the Risk Reduction as a Service category. It ingests output from third-party AppSec, infrastructure, cloud, and container scanners, aggregates and deduplicates findings across them, groups related findings into remediation actions, and routes those actions to the responsible engineering owner inside the existing ticketing stack (Jira, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps). The buyer assumption is that the scanners and the ticketing system are already in place and the AppSec or vulnerability management team needs an orchestration layer that turns scanner output into routed, owned, time-bound remediation work. SecPortal is the opposite shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
Seemplicity is organised around the connected scanner, the deduplicated finding, the routed remediation action, and the continuous campaign rather than around a scoped engagement with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, a vulnerability assessment, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable, Seemplicity does not carry that record.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Seemplicity output lives inside the Seemplicity console and inside the connected ticketing system. There is no white-label portal a security firm or in-house security team can hand to an external client or to a stakeholder business unit under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.
No native scanning across external, authenticated web, or code
Seemplicity is an orchestration and routing layer above scanners. It does not run its own external vulnerability scans, its own authenticated web testing, or its own SAST and SCA against connected repositories. The buyer is expected to license those scanners separately and ingest their output through the connector catalogue. SecPortal runs 16 external scanner modules, 17 authenticated web scanner modules, and SAST plus dependency analysis through Semgrep against connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories on the same workspace as findings, reports, and delivery.
No AI-generated executive summaries, technical writeups, or remediation narratives
Seemplicity produces remediation campaign dashboards, owner-level scorecards, SLA-attainment views, and operations reports, but it does not draft executive summaries, technical pentest writeups, or narrative remediation roadmaps that go to a board, an auditor, or an external client. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record so the deliverable goes out without separate writeup time.
Sales-led pricing tied to assets, scanners, and connectors
Seemplicity pricing is sales-led and typically licensed by asset count, scanner count, connector count, or seat tier, with a contract floor that fits enterprise procurement rather than self-service onboarding. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.
How a remediation orchestration platform and a delivery workspace see the same problem differently
Remediation orchestration is a useful category framing, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what an orchestration layer above many scanner contracts and a ticketing integration gives you and what it costs. The contrast below is between a platform that derives value from routing deduplicated work into an existing engineering work-tracking system and a delivery workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators run.
Remediation orchestration platforms route deduplicated work into an existing ticketing system
Seemplicity and adjacent remediation orchestration platforms start from the assumption that the AppSec, infrastructure, cloud, and container scanners are already in place and a mature ticketing system is already the system of record for engineering work. The economic value comes from aggregating and deduplicating findings across scanners, grouping related findings into a single remediation action, routing that action to the responsible owner inside Jira or ServiceNow, and tracking remediation campaigns through to closure. The platform is the routing and accountability layer that sits between scanner output and engineering work-tracking.
A delivery workspace owns the finding record from scan to closure
SecPortal does not assume that a remediation orchestration layer above many separate scanner contracts plus an existing ticketing system is the right shape for the work. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, and an external attack surface programme. The finding lives where the work is done, not in an orchestration console that ends when the action is routed.
The right answer depends on whether scanners and ticketing are already the platform or need to be
If the AppSec or vulnerability management team has already licensed Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, Semgrep, and several others in parallel, the engineering organisation already runs on Jira or ServiceNow, and the bottleneck is consolidating that signal into one routed, owned, time-bound remediation queue inside the ticketing system, a remediation orchestration platform like Seemplicity is the right shape. If the team needs the scanners themselves, the engagement record, the AI report, the branded portal, the manual finding entry, and the invoice on one workspace without a stack of separate scanner contracts and without a heavy ticketing integration project, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different teams; one is the right shape for a given buyer at a given time.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Seemplicity and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether you are routing deduplicated remediation actions into an existing scanner-and-ticketing stack or running scoped engagements and findings on one workspace.
Seemplicity fits mid-market and enterprise teams with an existing scanner-and-ticketing stack
If you are a mid-market or enterprise organisation, the AppSec and vulnerability management teams operate Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx, GHAS, Semgrep, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, container scanners, and cloud posture tools in parallel, the engineering organisation already runs on Jira or ServiceNow with mature SLAs and engineering ownership, and the bottleneck is consolidating findings across that stack into one routed remediation queue inside the ticketing system, Seemplicity was built for that orchestration shape. The buyer assumption is one orchestration layer that sits above the scanner stack and routes a deduplicated, owned remediation backlog into the existing engineering work-tracking system.
SecPortal fits teams who want scanning, findings, reports, and delivery in one workspace
If you are an AppSec team, a product security team, a vulnerability management team, an internal security team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a consultancy that wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, the manual finding entry, and the invoice all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing the team to license separate scanners and ingest their output through an orchestration layer or design a heavy ticketing integration before the first finding lands.
SecPortal fits buyers who deliver findings to clients, business units, or auditors
If you ship reports to external clients, business unit owners, or auditors, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download has to live under your brand rather than under a vendor console, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners outside SecPortal are part of the picture, alongside SecPortal native external, authenticated, and code scanning. The same record also serves an internal team that wants the deliverable shape (executive summary, technical writeup, remediation roadmap, retest closure pack) without licensing a separate writeup tool above an orchestration layer.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor on the Pro or Team tiers, no per-asset or per-connector licensing model, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal over Seemplicity
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record instead of an open-ended remediation campaign across many scanner contracts plus a ticketing integration
- Scan internally with 16 external modules, 17 authenticated modules, and SAST plus dependency analysis through Semgrep rather than relying on an orchestration layer above a stack of separately licensed scanners
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on your tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor remediation operations console plus the ticketing system
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit, instead of waiting for the next scanner cycle to re-surface or fail to re-surface the finding
- Document CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner without licensing a separate risk-weighting engine
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without a sales call, an asset-count audit, or a scanner-connector-count audit
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an in-house AppSec or vulnerability management programme rather than pay for a remediation orchestration layer above many scanner contracts plus a ticketing integration, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent comparisons that come up most often.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that names the four product shapes (analytics layer, single-vendor exposure, ITSM-tied response, engagement-record workspace) and when each fits.
- Scanner-to-ticket handoff governance for the routing-layer discipline between scanner output and engineering tickets that remediation orchestrators promise to automate.
- Vulnerability remediation campaign management for the campaign-level discipline behind grouping related findings into a single owned remediation action.
- Security finding ownership and routing for the ownership and routing discipline that remediation orchestrators automate against ticketing systems.
- Vulnerability prioritisation for the operational workflow that captures CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure into a defensible queue.
- Scanner result triage for ingesting Nessus, Burp, and CSV output into the same findings record that SecPortal native scanners feed.
- Security tool consolidation for the operational rationale behind moving from a stack of scanner contracts plus an orchestration layer to a single delivery workspace.
- Vulnerability backlog management for the queue-level discipline that prevents AppSec and infrastructure findings from aging into risk debt.
- Security finding deduplication economics for the cross-scanner deduplication economics that orchestration platforms claim to address.
- Security finding ownership decay for how routed ownership erodes between scanner detection and remediation closure when the platform is the only accountability layer.
- Vulnerability management programme maturity model for the maturity scaffold that frames whether a remediation orchestrator is the next investment or a delivery workspace would be more load-bearing.
- Findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, severity calibration, and 300+ finding templates.
- External scanning with 16 modules covering SSL, headers, ports, subdomains, and cloud exposure.
- Authenticated scanning with 17 modules running behind stored credentials in the encrypted credential vault.
- Code scanning with SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep on connected repositories.
- Bulk finding import from Nessus, Burp Suite, and CSV into the same engagement record SecPortal native scanners feed.
- SecPortal vs ArmorCode for the connector-aggregator ASPM alternative that ingests from existing AppSec scanner contracts.
- SecPortal vs Phoenix Security for the risk-based ASPM orchestrator alternative that consolidates AppSec, container, cloud, and infrastructure scanner output.
- SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber for the cyber-risk-based vulnerability orchestration alternative now part of Tenable One.
- SecPortal vs Kenna Security for the predictive-risk-scoring RBVM alternative now part of Cisco Vulnerability Management.
- SecPortal vs Nucleus Security for the unified vulnerability management alternative that aggregates scanner output across the enterprise estate.
- SecPortal vs Brinqa for the cyber-risk-analytics alternative that aggregates scanner output across infrastructure, AppSec, and cloud.
- SecPortal vs ServiceNow Vulnerability Response for the ITSM-anchored vulnerability response alternative inside the ServiceNow estate.
- SecPortal for AppSec teams for the in-house AppSec audience overview, including SAST, SCA, DAST, and manual review workflows.
- SecPortal for vulnerability management teams for the VM-team audience overview, including SLA, exception, and backlog discipline on the same record as scanning.
- SecPortal for CISOs for the security-leadership audience overview, including reporting, evidence retention, and programme maturity context.
When the work is scoped engagement delivery, native scanning, and AI reporting, not orchestrating remediation across an existing scanner-and-ticketing stack
Run scoped AppSec, pentest, vulnerability management, and cloud security assessment engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. SAST plus dependency analysis plus DAST plus external scanning live on the same engagement record alongside manual finding entry, the exception register, the retest workflow, and the activity audit trail. Pair alongside a Seemplicity deployment when the buyer also operates a wider portfolio of third-party scanners feeding a mature ticketing programme. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.