Comparison

SecPortal vs Outpost24
consolidated VM and EASM suite vs delivery workspace

Outpost24 is a consolidated vulnerability management vendor that combines network vulnerability management (Outscan and HIAB), external attack surface management (Sweepatic acquisition, branded as Outpost24 EASM), web application penetration testing as a service (SWAT), and risk-based vulnerability management with cyber threat intelligence (Outpost24 Pwn and Krakatoa). The buyer is typically a mid-market or enterprise internal security team, vulnerability management team, or AppSec team that wants a vendor-managed continuous programme combining scanning, EASM discovery, manual testing, and risk-based prioritisation against a defined asset estate. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM suite to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own.

Get Started Free

No credit card required. Free plan available forever.

Feature	SecPortal	Outpost24
Primary use case	Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, branded client portal, and engagement record on one tenant	Consolidated vendor suite combining network vulnerability management (Outscan, HIAB), external attack surface management (Sweepatic EASM), web application PTaaS (SWAT), and risk-based vulnerability management with cyber threat intelligence (Pwn, Krakatoa) into one programme
Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables		Continuous programme against the registered asset estate with periodic SWAT manual testing engagements layered on top rather than a workspace built around scoped engagements with kickoffs and deliverables
Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control		Internal user roles inside the Outpost24 portal; no external client onboarding model with white-label brand isolation
Branded white-label client portal on a tenant subdomain
Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules: SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, CVE correlation)		Native network vulnerability scanning across internet-facing hosts as part of Outscan, plus Sweepatic-derived EASM discovery against the external footprint
Authenticated web application scanning (DAST, 17 modules)		SWAT runs vendor-led authenticated web application pentesting as a recurring service rather than as an operator-driven scan inside a customer workspace
Code scanning (SAST and SCA via Semgrep)
Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery		Sweepatic-derived EASM module continuously catalogues the external footprint as part of the consolidated suite
Network vulnerability scanning across internal hosts	Authenticated and external scanning against verified domains and stored credentials	Core mechanic; HIAB (Hardened Internet Appliance) is the on-premise scanner for internal network estates
Manual finding entry with full editor		SWAT findings are entered by the vendor consultancy team rather than by the customer operator inside the customer workspace
AI-powered narrative report generation (executive, technical, remediation)		Vendor-curated dashboards, prioritised finding feeds, and SWAT-delivered consultancy reports rather than engagement-shaped AI-drafted executive, technical, and remediation deliverables under the customer brand
300+ finding templates with remediation guidance		Vendor-curated vulnerability records with consultancy-validated remediation guidance
CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring		CVSS scoring combined with risk-based prioritisation through the Outpost24 Pwn risk engine and Krakatoa cyber threat intelligence
Risk-based prioritisation against cyber threat intelligence	CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, finding overrides with eight-field decision chain, and engagement-record context	Core mechanic; Outpost24 Pwn applies risk-based scoring and Krakatoa supplies cyber threat intelligence feeds to prioritise the validated finding feed
Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV)		Outpost24-native scanning and the consolidated feed are the primary intake paths rather than third-party scanner ingestion through customer-managed import
Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM)		Credentials handled inside the managed scanning service for authenticated coverage
Vendor-led web application pentesting as a managed service (PTaaS)		Core mechanic; SWAT is the recurring vendor consultancy team running authenticated web application pentests on a scheduled cadence and delivering findings into the portal
On-premise scanner appliance for internal estates		Core mechanic; HIAB is the hardened on-premise appliance for internal network vulnerability scanning behind the perimeter
Retest workflow paired to original finding		Closure validation runs through the next SWAT engagement cycle or the next Outscan scheduled scan rather than a tester-driven retest paired to the original record under the customer brand
Exception register with eight-field decision chain		Per-finding accepted-risk and false-positive handling inside the managed validation workflow
Compliance framework templates	21 frameworks including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight	Compliance reporting derived from the consolidated finding feed against the asset estate, including PCI DSS, ISO 27001, NIS2, and DORA coverage
Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly)		Continuous scanning against the registered asset estate is the platform default rather than a configurable engagement-record cadence
Scan-to-scan diff and change-event generation across scheduled runs		Trend, drift, and prioritised finding movement views derived from the consolidated feed
Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments for engagements
Activity audit trail with CSV export		Platform audit logs inside the Outpost24 portal
MFA enforcement on every workspace		SSO and IdP-driven controls inside the customer tenant
Free plan available		Sales-led commercial pricing rather than a published free tier
Pricing model	Free, Pro, Team	Sales-led with annual commitment, priced on the registered asset estate (hosts, web applications, external footprint) and the module set (Outscan, HIAB, EASM, SWAT, Pwn, Krakatoa)
Setup time	2 minutes	Named account onboarding, asset registration, HIAB appliance deployment for internal estates, SWAT engagement scoping, and EASM baseline calibration over a multi-week ramp
Best fit for	AppSec teams, internal security teams, vulnerability management teams, product security teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that want scanning, findings, AI reports, branded portal, and the engagement record on one workspace	Mid-market and enterprise internal security and vulnerability management teams that want a vendor-managed consolidated suite combining network VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM under one annual contract

SecPortal vs Outpost24: consolidated VM and EASM suite vs delivery workspace

Outpost24 is a European consolidated vulnerability management vendor. The product set combines network vulnerability management (Outscan as the cloud scanner and HIAB as the on-premise appliance), external attack surface management (the Sweepatic acquisition, rebranded as Outpost24 EASM, continuously catalogues the public-facing footprint), web application penetration testing as a service (SWAT, where a vendor consultancy team runs recurring authenticated web application pentests against the registered estate), and risk-based vulnerability management with cyber threat intelligence (Outpost24 Pwn applies a risk-based scoring engine and Krakatoa supplies the threat intelligence feed). The platform is delivered as cloud-based SaaS plus the on-premise HIAB appliance, and the commercial path is sales-led with annual commitment. The buyer is typically a mid-market or enterprise internal security, vulnerability management, or AppSec team that wants a vendor-managed consolidated programme against a defined asset estate.

SecPortal is a different shape. SecPortal is the security delivery and findings workspace for AppSec teams, product security teams, vulnerability management teams, internal security teams, penetration testing firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that run scoped engagements and ship findings to application owners, business unit stakeholders, auditors, or external clients. The engagement, the scoping, the manual and scanner findings, the AI-drafted report, the branded client portal, the retest, and the invoice all sit inside one workspace. If the buying question is whether to license a consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM suite or run a delivery workspace that holds scoped engagements and ships deliverables, this page is the side-by-side.

Where the consolidated suite model stops for delivery work

These are not Outpost24-specific criticisms; they are properties of a consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM vendor suite when the buyer compares it to a delivery workspace that holds scoped engagements, ships engagement-shaped reports, and runs under the security team brand.

Built around a consolidated vendor suite, not a scoped delivery workspace

Outpost24 is a consolidated vulnerability management vendor that combines network vulnerability management (Outscan as the cloud scanner and HIAB as the on-premise appliance), external attack surface management (the Sweepatic acquisition rebranded as Outpost24 EASM), web application penetration testing as a service (SWAT, where a vendor consultancy team runs recurring authenticated web application pentests against the registered estate), and risk-based vulnerability management with cyber threat intelligence (Outpost24 Pwn and Krakatoa). The buyer assumption is a mid-market or enterprise internal security or vulnerability management team that wants a vendor to run the scanner, manage the EASM crawler, deliver the manual web testing, and prioritise the consolidated feed against threat intelligence under one annual contract. SecPortal is a different shape: a security delivery and remediation workspace that runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the engagement record (scope, kickoff, deliverable, retest, closure), accepts manual finding entry from the workspace team, drafts the AI report, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain.

No engagement-shaped scope, deliverable, or closure record

Outpost24 is organised around the registered asset estate, the continuous Outscan and EASM coverage, the SWAT recurring pentest cadence, and the Pwn-prioritised finding feed against Krakatoa cyber threat intelligence. There is no concept of a scoped engagement that opens with a kickoff, runs against a defined target list and timebox, ships a signed-off final report under a stakeholder name, schedules a tester-driven retest paired to the original finding, and closes with an invoice. Teams that need to deliver a scoped pentest, a one-off vulnerability assessment, an AppSec review, a cloud security assessment, or a compliance-driven security testing engagement on top of consolidated continuous coverage have to model that engagement lifecycle outside the Outpost24 portal.

No branded client portal on your own subdomain

Outpost24 findings, EASM discoveries, SWAT pentest deliverables, and Pwn-prioritised risk views are reviewed inside the Outpost24 portal. The portal serves the internal security team that licensed the suite. There is no white-label tenant subdomain a security team can hand to an external client, an application owner, a business unit stakeholder, a regulator, or an auditor under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name. That matters whenever the security testing output goes to a recipient who is reading a deliverable, not operating a consolidated vendor suite.

No engagement-shaped AI narrative reports

Outpost24 surfaces vendor-curated dashboards (Outscan severity views, EASM exposure tiers, SWAT engagement deliverables, Pwn risk-based prioritisation cards) and delivers consultancy-authored SWAT pentest reports per engagement cycle. It does not draft engagement-shaped executive summaries, narrative technical writeups, or remediation roadmaps from an arbitrary scoped finding set on demand under the customer brand. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live engagement findings, including CVSS vectors, evidence, severity, asset context, and proof-of-exploit details, so the team edits a draft rather than starting from a blank page.

No code scanning inside the same workspace

Outpost24 covers the network surface, the external attack surface, and the web application surface through Outscan, HIAB, EASM, and SWAT. It does not run SAST or SCA against connected source repositories as part of the same console. Programmes that combine consolidated VM coverage with secure code review or supply-chain dependency analysis have to stitch the code-side output together through a separate AppSec tool. SecPortal runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against repositories connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth, and the code-side findings sit on the same engagement record as the external and authenticated scan output.

Sales-led pricing tied to module set, asset estate, and SWAT engagement cycles

Outpost24 pricing is sales-led and is typically licensed against the registered asset estate (hosts, web applications, external footprint), the module set selected from Outscan, HIAB, EASM, SWAT, Pwn, and Krakatoa, and the SWAT pentest cycle cadence. Annual commitment, named-account onboarding, HIAB appliance deployment for internal estates, SWAT engagement scoping, and a multi-week ramp to baseline the estate are standard. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers; new workspaces can sign up and run a scan inside two minutes.

Consolidated suite vs delivery workspace as buyer shapes

The honest framing is that the two models solve adjacent problems for different buyer shapes. Saying one is universally better than the other misses the underlying buying decision the security team is making.

A consolidated suite is built around the asset estate and the vendor-managed coverage feed

Outpost24 and adjacent consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM suites start from the assumption that the customer has a defined asset estate (hosts, web applications, external footprint, internal network), wants the vendor to run continuous scanning across that estate, wants a vendor consultancy team to run periodic manual pentests on top, wants the external footprint catalogued through an EASM crawler, and wants the consolidated finding feed prioritised through a risk-based engine fed by cyber threat intelligence. The economic value is removing the per-finding triage and validation cost from the internal security team by paying the vendor for analyst hours, EASM coverage, manual pentest delivery, and threat intelligence under one consolidated annual contract.

A delivery workspace is built around the engagement record and the deliverable

SecPortal does not assume that a consolidated vendor-managed suite against the whole estate is the right shape for every security testing programme. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, drafts the AI report, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, a cloud security assessment, an API security review, and a compliance-driven engagement. The finding lives where the work is delivered, not in a vendor-prioritised feed that ends at the SLA boundary.

The right answer depends on whether the security team is buying suite coverage or shipping deliverables

If the internal security or vulnerability management team has a stable asset estate, an existing remediation workflow, and a budget shape that fits a consolidated vendor suite priced on the asset estate and the module set, and the team wants vendor analysts and consultants to absorb scanner triage, EASM coverage, and recurring manual pentest delivery, a consolidated suite like Outpost24 is the right shape. If the team is shipping engagement deliverables to internal application owners, external clients, business unit stakeholders, regulators, or auditors and the buyer wants the scanner, the manual finding entry, the AI report, the branded portal, the invoice, and the retest on one workspace without a heavy onboarding ramp, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different teams or for the same team at different programme phases.

Who each platform is the right fit for

Buyer fit is the operating question, not feature parity. The right platform depends on whether the security team is paying for a vendor-managed consolidated suite against a defined asset estate or shipping engagement deliverables on a delivery workspace.

Outpost24 fits enterprise VM teams buying a vendor-managed consolidated suite

If you are a mid-market or enterprise internal security, vulnerability management, or AppSec team, the asset estate is reasonably stable across internet-facing hosts and internal network estate, the executive sponsor wants vendor analysts and consultants to absorb scanner triage and recurring manual pentest delivery, and the budget fits a sales-led annual programme priced on the asset estate and the module set across network VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM, Outpost24 was built for that shape. The buyer is paying for the combination of continuous Outscan and HIAB scanner coverage, the Sweepatic-derived EASM crawler against the external footprint, the SWAT vendor consultancy team running recurring authenticated web application pentests, and the Pwn risk-based prioritisation against Krakatoa cyber threat intelligence under one annual contract.

SecPortal fits teams shipping engagement deliverables on a delivery workspace

If you are an AppSec team, a product security team, a vulnerability management team, an internal security team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a consultancy that wants the scanner, the engagement record, the manual finding entry, the AI report, the branded portal, the invoice, and the retest all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing the team to license a consolidated vendor suite or design a multi-week onboarding ramp before the first deliverable lands. The same workspace serves an internal team shipping reports to application owners and a firm shipping reports to external clients.

SecPortal fits buyers who want the deliverable, the brand, and the engagement record on one workspace

If the security testing output is read by an application owner, a business unit stakeholder, an auditor, a regulator, or an external client, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download has to live under your brand rather than under a consolidated vendor suite brand, SecPortal is the workspace that holds the record. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners outside SecPortal are part of the picture, alongside SecPortal native external, authenticated, and code scanning. The same record holds for an internal team that wants the deliverable shape (executive summary, technical writeup, remediation roadmap, retest closure pack) without buying analyst hours or SWAT consultancy hours from a consolidated suite.

Pricing comparison

SecPortal publishes pricing on the website. Outpost24 pricing is sales-led with annual commitment and is licensed against the registered asset estate and the module set; the public website does not list a published self-serve tier. The tiers below are illustrative of the buying shape rather than a direct per-feature equivalence.

SecPortal Free

Free forever

1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.

SecPortal Pro

$149 per month

Unlimited clients and engagements, AI reports, full external scanner suite, authenticated scanning, code scanning, retesting workflow, and branded client portal.

SecPortal Team

$299 per month

Everything in Pro plus team management, RBAC, invoicing, continuous monitoring schedules, scan diff, and additional AI credits.

Outpost24

Sales-led pricing

Annual commitment priced on the registered asset estate (hosts, web applications, external footprint) and the module set selected from Outscan, HIAB, EASM, SWAT, Pwn, and Krakatoa, with named-account onboarding and HIAB appliance deployment for internal estates.

Why teams pick SecPortal alongside or instead of Outpost24

Move from a sales-led consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM suite to a workspace that holds engagements, findings, AI reports, retests, exceptions, and a branded portal on one record
Generate executive summaries, technical writeups, and remediation roadmaps from engagement findings rather than exporting Outscan, EASM, and SWAT dashboards into a separate reporting tool
Hand application owners, external clients, regulators, or auditors a branded portal on your subdomain instead of access to a vendor-operated consolidated suite portal
Run external scanning (SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, CVE correlation) inside the same workspace as authenticated DAST, code scanning, and the engagement record instead of pairing Outscan and Sweepatic EASM with separate scanners and a separate reporting layer
Capture manual findings (broken object-level authorisation walkthroughs, mass-assignment proofs, business-logic chains, hardcoded credential traces, design-level weaknesses) alongside scanner output rather than waiting for the next SWAT engagement cycle to land
Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit rather than relying on the next continuous scanning cycle or the next SWAT engagement cycle to confirm the fix
Track exceptions on an eight-field decision chain (rationale, approver, owner, scope, compensating control, evidence, expiry, review cadence) on the same engagement record as the open finding population
Map findings across 21 frameworks including OWASP Top 10, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST CSF 2.0, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight from one workspace
Bill the engagement from the same platform with Stripe Connect rather than handling consolidated suite licensing in a separate procurement cycle
Start on a free plan and pay for the seats and storage you actually use rather than committing to a sales-led annual consolidated suite contract
Run SecPortal alongside Outpost24 when a vendor-managed consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM programme sits next to scoped engagement delivery to application owners, auditors, or external clients

How SecPortal scanning compares to the Outpost24 module set

SecPortal scanning is operator-driven across external, authenticated, and code surfaces. The same workspace runs the external perimeter scan, the authenticated DAST scan against verified domains, and the SAST plus dependency analysis scan against a connected source repository, then surfaces the findings on the engagement record the operator owns. Outpost24 runs Outscan as the cloud network scanner, HIAB as the on-premise appliance for internal estates, the Sweepatic-derived EASM crawler against the external footprint, SWAT as the recurring vendor-led web application pentest service, and Pwn plus Krakatoa as the risk-based prioritisation and threat intelligence layer on top of the consolidated feed. The trade is vendor-managed consolidated coverage bundled into one annual contract against operator control of the testing surface and the engagement-shaped deliverable.

The external scanning feature runs 16 modules across SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation. The authenticated scanning feature adds DAST behind stored credentials through cookie, bearer, basic, or form authentication so issues that only surface inside an authenticated session do not slip past anonymous scanning. The code scanning feature runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against a repository connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth. The continuous monitoring feature runs daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly scans on a schedule and writes the results back to the same engagement record.

How credentials and authorisation are handled before any scan runs

Authenticated scanning needs credentials to live somewhere durable, and external scanning needs proof of target ownership before any module fires. SecPortal stores credentials in an encrypted credential vault with AES-256-GCM, scoped to a verified domain. Every external scan is gated on domain verification through DNS TXT or meta tag, and the scan-guard codes (DOMAIN_NOT_VERIFIED, CREDENTIAL_DOMAIN_MISMATCH, AUTH_NOT_ALLOWED) refuse to run when the chain of evidence does not hold. The authorisation discipline lives in the workspace rather than inside a vendor-managed consolidated suite.

From scan to deliverable

The output of a scan is the beginning of a deliverable, not the end. SecPortal turns scan results into draft findings, the operator triages and validates them, the findings management layer holds the consolidated record with CVSS vectors, evidence, and remediation, and the AI reports feature generates the executive and technical narrative the recipient receives. The branded client portal is where the deliverable lands; the remediation tracking workflow covers how scanner output, manual findings, and the named owner chain hold the closure record together until every finding clears.

For internal security teams that want to run an Outpost24 programme for vendor-managed consolidated coverage and a SecPortal workspace for engagement delivery in parallel, the security testing programme management workflow covers how findings from multiple sources move from intake to closure with named owners, SLA tiers, and an audit trail. The importing third-party scanner results guide documents the verified Nessus, Burp Suite, and CSV import paths when the team wants to consolidate Outpost24 output and SecPortal native findings on the same engagement record.

How the SWAT manual pentest cycle pairs with engagement-shaped delivery

SWAT delivers recurring authenticated web application pentests through a vendor consultancy team and lands the findings inside the Outpost24 portal. When the security team needs to translate a SWAT cycle into a stakeholder-facing deliverable under the security team brand (an executive summary for the business unit owner, a technical writeup for the engineering team, a remediation roadmap for the platform engineering team, a closure pack for the auditor), the operator can promote the SWAT findings onto a SecPortal engagement record. The AppSec or product security operator reviews the SWAT report, reproduces the underlying vulnerability against the application, writes the finding with reproduction steps and a CVSS vector through the findings management layer, and routes it to the engineering owner through the ownership and routing workflow. The SWAT engagement captures that the vendor team validated the finding; the SecPortal engagement record captures the named-owner remediation chain, the retest closure, and the audit-defensible evidence trail under the security team brand.

How the EASM exposure feed pairs with engagement-shaped delivery

Outpost24 EASM (the Sweepatic-derived module) continuously catalogues the external footprint and surfaces exposure findings through the portal. When an exposure finding rises to the threshold of engagement-shaped delivery (a newly discovered subdomain with an exposed administrative panel, an unintended cloud asset registered on a public DNS zone, a forgotten staging environment with a known vulnerability), the operator can open a SecPortal engagement against the affected asset, re-run the external scanning suite against the verified domain, add manual finding entries for the exposure context, generate an AI report under the security team brand, and ship the deliverable through the branded portal. The EASM feed surfaces the exposure; the SecPortal engagement record carries the engagement deliverable, the named-owner remediation chain, and the closure evidence.

Honest scope: what SecPortal does not do

SecPortal is a security testing and delivery workspace. It is not a consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM vendor suite, not an on-premise scanner appliance, and not a vendor consultancy team running recurring manual web application pentests. The capabilities below are intentionally out of scope so the buyer can read the comparison accurately.

SecPortal does not run a continuous network vulnerability scanner against a registered internal estate; the equivalent of Outpost24 Outscan plus HIAB across thousands of internal hosts on a continuous schedule is not a SecPortal capability.
SecPortal does not ship an on-premise scanner appliance for customer data centres; HIAB-class on-premise deployment is not a SecPortal capability and the workspace runs as cloud-based SaaS.
SecPortal does not provide a vendor consultancy team running recurring authenticated web application pentests as a managed service; SWAT-style vendor-delivered manual pentest cycles are not a SecPortal offering. SecPortal supports a workspace operator delivering their own engagement under their own brand.
SecPortal does not run a continuous external attack surface management crawler against the public-facing internet on a real-time basis the way Sweepatic-derived Outpost24 EASM does. The external scanning module fires against verified domains the workspace owner registers rather than continuously crawling for new subdomains and assets across the public DNS namespace.
SecPortal does not ship a built-in cyber threat intelligence feed or a risk-based prioritisation engine the equivalent of Outpost24 Pwn plus Krakatoa. Finding severity uses CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, the eight-field finding override chain, and the engagement-record context rather than a vendor-managed threat intelligence overlay.
SecPortal does not ship packaged push connectors into Jira, ServiceNow, Slack, Teams, PagerDuty, SIEM, SOAR, GRC, or CMDB platforms; integration into those systems is the workspace consumer responsibility rather than a managed offering.
SecPortal does not provide enterprise SSO, SCIM provisioning, or SAML federation; workspace authentication uses email and password with mandatory MFA via TOTP.
SecPortal does not act as the bench delivering managed offensive testing on demand; the workspace serves the team delivering its own engagements rather than carrying a vendor pentest service.

Adjacent comparisons

If the evaluation is between Outpost24 and other consolidated VM platforms, EASM products, PTaaS services, or RBVM tools, the comparisons below cover the same buying decision from different angles.

SecPortal vs Edgescan for the Hybrid PTaaS continuous managed-validation comparison.
SecPortal vs Tenable.io for the consolidated network vulnerability management comparison.
SecPortal vs Tenable One for the exposure management platform comparison covering VM plus EASM plus cloud.
SecPortal vs Qualys for the enterprise VM cloud platform comparison.
SecPortal vs Rapid7 for the broad VM, AppSec, and detection consolidated platform comparison.
SecPortal vs Detectify for the external attack surface monitoring comparison.
SecPortal vs Intruder for the SaaS continuous external and authenticated scanner comparison.
SecPortal vs Cobalt for the PTaaS marketplace comparison adjacent to the SWAT vendor-led pentest model.
SecPortal vs Probely for the managed SaaS DAST scan engine comparison.
SecPortal vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for the Microsoft-stack consolidated VM comparison.
SecPortal vs Nucleus Security for the risk-based vulnerability management aggregator comparison.
SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber for the risk-based VM orchestrator comparison.
SecPortal vs Kenna Security for the predictive risk-based prioritisation comparison.
SecPortal vs Brinqa for the unified vulnerability and risk operations comparison.

When the work is scoped engagement delivery, native scanning, and AI reporting on a workspace your team operates, not a vendor-managed consolidated VM, EASM, PTaaS, and RBVM programme

Run scoped AppSec, pentest, vulnerability management, and cloud security assessment engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. SAST plus dependency analysis plus DAST plus external scanning live on the same engagement record alongside manual finding entry, the exception register, the retest workflow, and the activity audit trail. Pair alongside an Outpost24 deployment when the security team also runs a vendor-managed consolidated VM programme against a defined asset estate. Start free.