SecPortal vs Tenable One
unified exposure platform vs delivery workspace
Tenable One is the unified Exposure Management Platform from Tenable. The product bundles Tenable Vulnerability Management for network and infrastructure scanning, Tenable Web App Scanning for DAST, Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic) for CNAPP and CIEM across AWS, Azure, and GCP, Tenable Identity Exposure (formerly Tenable.ad) for Active Directory and Entra ID exposure, Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Bit Discovery) for external attack surface discovery, Tenable OT Security (formerly Indegy) for operational technology, Tenable Inventory for asset aggregation, and Tenable Lumin for cyber exposure analytics. The console rolls everything into one Asset Exposure Score (AES) per asset and one Cyber Exposure Score (CES) per business unit, with ExposureAI for query and prioritisation across the unified record. The buyer is the enterprise security team that wants one vendor and one unified exposure record across asset classes. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI-generated reports, a branded client portal, native external and authenticated web scanning, and SAST plus SCA on connected repositories all live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a unified enterprise exposure platform across asset classes to a delivery workspace that scans, records, reports, and ships findings on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scoped engagements, scanning, AI reports, and client portal on one tenant | Unified Exposure Management Platform across vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and external attack surface assets with one Asset Exposure Score |
| Product shape | Single multi-tenant SaaS workspace | Eight bundled modules under one console with one exposure score |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Programme model on assets owned by the enterprise rather than scoped engagement | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal business unit and asset owner model | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Limited; scanner and connector ingestion is the primary record path | |
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | ExposureAI natural-language query plus Lumin exposure analytics dashboards rather than narrative deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Plugin-mapped vulnerability records across the Nessus plugin library plus module-emitted findings | |
| External vulnerability scanning | 16 modules (DNS, TLS, ports, headers, technology, subdomain enumeration, path probing, CVE matching, etc.) | Tenable Vulnerability Management plus Tenable Attack Surface Management |
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | 17 modules | Tenable Web App Scanning |
| Code scanning (SAST and SCA via Semgrep) | ||
| Cloud security posture management (CSPM) | Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic) covers CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, KSPM, and IaC across AWS, Azure, and GCP | |
| Cloud identity and entitlement management (CIEM) | Tenable Cloud Security CIEM module | |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Tenable Cloud Security KSPM and container module | |
| Active Directory and Entra ID identity exposure | Tenable Identity Exposure (formerly Tenable.ad) | |
| Operational technology (OT) and ICS exposure | Tenable OT Security (formerly Indegy) | |
| External attack surface discovery outside connected accounts | Subdomain enumeration and discovery on verified domains | Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Bit Discovery) maps internet-facing assets at organisation scope |
| Domain verification before any external scan | DNS TXT or meta tag | Asset ownership configured at organisation scope inside the platform |
| Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) | ||
| Unified asset record across modules | Findings record scoped to an engagement on the workspace | Tenable Inventory aggregates assets across modules into one record with the Asset Exposure Score |
| Cross-module risk scoring | CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring per finding | Asset Exposure Score (AES) per asset, Cyber Exposure Score (CES) per business unit, Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR), Asset Criticality Rating (ACR) |
| Predictive prioritisation | CVSS, finding template, and engagement context held on the record | VPR machine-learning prioritisation across the Nessus plugin library |
| Natural-language query across the platform | Workspace chat against the engagement record | ExposureAI natural-language query across the unified inventory |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Native ingestion across the Tenable module suite plus connectors into ticketing and CI/CD | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Credential store inside the platform for Nessus authenticated scanning and web app scanning | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure on the next scheduled or manual run; reopens managed through the asset record | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks (OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, Essential Eight, etc.) | Compliance dashboards mapped to module-emitted findings plus prebuilt CIS, PCI DSS, and DISA STIG benchmark scans |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs at enterprise scope | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls with SAML, OIDC, and SCIM in enterprise tiers | |
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led annual licensing on Tenable One; asset-count and module-count drive contract value with separate licensing for OT, Identity Exposure, and Cloud Security depending on bundle |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Per-module onboarding plus connector configuration plus inventory aggregation plus AES calibration |
| Best fit for | Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, cloud security teams, GRC teams, and in-house security functions that scan, report, and deliver scoped work from one workspace | Enterprise security teams that want one vendor and one unified exposure record across vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and external attack surface assets with cross-module exposure scoring and a single procurement contract |
SecPortal vs Tenable One: unified exposure platform vs delivery workspace
Tenable One is the unified Exposure Management Platform from Tenable. The product bundles Tenable Vulnerability Management for network and infrastructure scanning, Tenable Web App Scanning for DAST, Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic) for CNAPP and CIEM across AWS, Azure, and GCP, Tenable Identity Exposure (formerly Tenable.ad) for Active Directory and Entra ID exposure, Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Bit Discovery) for external attack surface discovery, Tenable OT Security (formerly Indegy) for operational technology, Tenable Inventory for cross-module asset aggregation, and Tenable Lumin for cyber exposure analytics, then rolls every signal into one Asset Exposure Score (AES) per asset and one Cyber Exposure Score (CES) per business unit. ExposureAI sits across the unified inventory as a natural-language query and prioritisation layer. The buyer assumption is that the asset estate is the record of truth and the enterprise wants one vendor across asset classes with one defensible exposure score the CISO can report to the board.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security delivery workspace that carries scoped engagements, manual and scanner-driven findings, AI-generated reports, a branded client portal, and an audit trail all on one tenant. The buyer is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, a cloud security team, a GRC team, or an in-house security function whose work covers scoped engagements and whose deliverables go to external clients, business units, or auditors. If you are comparing a unified enterprise exposure platform across asset classes to a delivery workspace that scans, reports, and ships findings on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the enterprise exposure-management and risk-based vulnerability management categories often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs Tenable.io, SecPortal vs Qualys, SecPortal vs Rapid7, SecPortal vs Wiz, SecPortal vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, and SecPortal vs ServiceNow Vulnerability Response.
Where Tenable One stops for engagement, manual finding, and delivery work
These are not Tenable-specific criticisms; they are properties of a unified enterprise exposure platform when you compare it to running scoped engagements, manual reviews, external and authenticated web scanning, AI report writing, and branded delivery on a single workspace.
Built as a unified Exposure Management Platform, not a delivery workspace
Tenable One is a unified Exposure Management Platform. The product bundles Tenable Vulnerability Management for network and infrastructure scanning, Tenable Web App Scanning for DAST, Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic) for CNAPP and CIEM, Tenable Identity Exposure (formerly Tenable.ad) for Active Directory and Entra ID, Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Bit Discovery) for external attack surface discovery, Tenable OT Security (formerly Indegy) for operational technology, Tenable Inventory for cross-module asset aggregation, and Tenable Lumin for cyber exposure analytics, then rolls every signal into one Asset Exposure Score (AES) per asset and one Cyber Exposure Score (CES) per business unit, with ExposureAI for natural-language query and prioritisation across the unified record. The buyer assumption is that the asset estate is the record of truth and the enterprise wants one vendor across asset classes. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI-generated reports, branded client portal, native external and authenticated web scanning, and SAST plus SCA on connected repositories all live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
Tenable One is organised around the asset, the vulnerability, the exposure score, and the business unit. There is no scoped engagement record with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, a vulnerability assessment, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, a third-party security review, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable that goes to a named stakeholder, Tenable One does not carry that record. SecPortal does, on the same workspace as the scanner, the report generator, the credential vault, the activity log, and the client portal.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Tenable One output lives inside the Tenable console and inside connected ticketing tools. There is no white-label portal a security team, consultancy, or service provider can hand to an external client, a business unit owner, or an auditor under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, document, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.
No native pentest, manual finding, or narrative report workflow
Tenable One produces plugin-driven vulnerability findings, module-emitted exposure findings, and exposure analytics dashboards through Lumin and ExposureAI, but it does not draft narrative pentest reports, accept manual finding entry from a tester or reviewer outside the scanner-emitted records, or generate executive summaries and remediation roadmaps written for a board, an auditor, or an external client. SecPortal supports manual finding entry with a full editor backed by 300+ finding templates, drafts executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record, and pairs every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit.
Sales-led enterprise licensing across modules
Tenable One pricing is sales-led and licensed by asset count, with separate licensing tiers for Tenable OT Security, Tenable Identity Exposure, and Tenable Cloud Security depending on bundle. The contract floor and procurement cycle fit enterprise procurement rather than self-service onboarding. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.
Workflow lives in the enterprise console, not on a per-engagement record
Tenable One assumes one enterprise tenant per organisation, with business units, asset tags, and access scopes inside it. There is no multi-tenant workspace model where a security firm runs one engagement per client with isolated findings, isolated scans, isolated documents, isolated invoicing, and an isolated branded portal. SecPortal is multi-tenant by design at the workspace layer so every engagement holds its own record without leaking into the next client.
How a unified exposure platform and a delivery workspace see the same problem differently
Exposure Management is a useful category framing for cross-asset risk aggregation, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what a unified enterprise platform gives you and where the engagement, manual finding, and delivery workflow has to go instead. The contrast below is between a unified exposure platform that derives value from rolling module-emitted signal into one risk view and a delivery workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators run.
A unified exposure platform aggregates asset signal across modules and produces one risk view
Tenable One and similar unified exposure platforms (Qualys VMDR with the broader Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform, Rapid7 Exposure Command across InsightVM and InsightCloudSec, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management folded into Defender for Cloud, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management on the Falcon platform) start from the assumption that the asset estate is the record of truth. The economic value comes from one console that reads vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and external attack surface signal across the organisation and rolls it into a defensible exposure score the CISO can report to the board. The product is the cross-asset risk view that sits above the scanners.
A delivery workspace owns the engagement and finding record from scope to closure
SecPortal does not assume that a cross-asset exposure score is the right shape for every kind of security work. The workspace runs scoped engagements, supports manual finding entry from a tester or reviewer, runs its own external and authenticated web scanning plus code scanning on connected repositories, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, ships AI-generated executive, technical, and remediation deliverables, and serves the report and the live findings through a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, a third-party security review, and an external attack surface programme.
The right answer depends on whether the work is cross-asset exposure aggregation or scoped delivery
If the team is an enterprise security function that owns vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and ASM across the organisation, the bottleneck is correlating module-emitted signal into one defensible exposure record, and the buyer needs one vendor with cross-module scoring and a single procurement contract, Tenable One is the right shape. If the team is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, a cloud security team, or an in-house security function whose work spans scoped engagements, manual finding entry, external perimeter scanning, authenticated web testing, code scanning, AI report writing, and branded client delivery, a delivery workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Many enterprises run both: Tenable One for the cross-asset exposure layer and a delivery workspace for the engagement, finding, and report lifecycle that sits beside it.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Tenable One and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether the work is cross-asset exposure aggregation across vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and ASM signal or scoped engagements, manual review, external scanning, and branded delivery on one workspace. Many enterprises run both, with the unified exposure platform carrying the cross-asset risk layer and the delivery workspace carrying the engagement record beside it.
Tenable One fits enterprise security teams aggregating exposure across asset classes
If you are an enterprise security team that owns vulnerability, web, cloud, identity, OT, and external attack surface signal across the organisation, the asset of record is the asset estate, the bottleneck is correlating module-emitted findings into one defensible cross-asset exposure score the CISO can report to the board, and the team needs one vendor with cross-module scoring (AES, CES, VPR, ACR) and a single procurement contract, Tenable One was built for that unified-exposure shape. The buyer assumption is one enterprise tenant with one inventory and one exposure score sitting above the scanners.
SecPortal fits teams who run scoped engagements, scan, and ship deliverables
If you are a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, a cloud security team, a GRC team, or an in-house security function whose work covers scoped engagements, manual finding entry, external perimeter scanning, authenticated web testing, code scanning, AI-generated reporting, and branded delivery, SecPortal carries that lifecycle on one tenant. Findings, scans, retests, exception decisions, evidence, document attachments, and the activity audit trail all live on the engagement record rather than scattered across an enterprise exposure console, a separate report generator, a separate scope-of-work template, and a separate portal.
SecPortal fits buyers who deliver findings to clients, business units, or auditors
If you ship reports to external clients, business unit owners, or auditors, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download has to live under your brand on a tenant subdomain rather than under a vendor console, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record. Tenable One output goes into the Tenable console and into developer surfaces in the enterprise that owns the asset; it is not a delivery workspace for findings produced outside that exposure-management surface.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor on the Pro or Team tiers, no per-asset licensing model, no separate module licensing for cloud, identity, or OT, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal alongside or instead of Tenable One
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record rather than an open-ended exposure backlog inside an enterprise console
- Scan the perimeter with 16 external modules and 17 authenticated web modules in addition to SAST plus SCA on connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
- Enter manual findings from a tester, reviewer, or third-party report into the same record the scanners feed
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor exposure-management console
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit
- Document CVSS 3.1 vector, asset binding, exposure context, and compensating controls on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without an asset-count audit, a connected-module audit, or a sales call for the Pro and Team tiers
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an enterprise exposure management programme alongside or instead of Tenable One, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent explainers that come up most often when teams compare a unified exposure platform to a delivery workspace.
- Continuous Threat Exposure Management explained for the programme-cycle framing that sits above unified exposure platforms and names the five-step Gartner CTEM cycle.
- External Attack Surface Management explained for the EASM half of the unified-platform story and how it differs from the Tenable Attack Surface Management module.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that names the four product shapes and where a unified exposure platform like Tenable One fits.
- SecPortal for vulnerability management teams for the audience page that lays out the verify-scan-store-triage-route-retest-report loop on the workspace.
- SecPortal for CISOs for the security leadership audience page covering the engagement-record, evidence, and reporting surface CISOs read against.
- Vulnerability prioritisation for the operational workflow that captures CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, and exposure context into a defensible queue.
- Scanner result triage for ingesting Nessus, Burp, and CSV output into the same findings record that SecPortal native scanners feed.
- Security tool consolidation for the operational rationale behind which security tools sit on which side of the unified-exposure boundary.
- Asset criticality scoring for the asset-tiering discipline that turns AES, ACR, or any other criticality signal into a defensible prioritisation queue.
- Asset ownership mapping for findings for the routing discipline that binds every finding to a named owner so cross-module exposure findings actually move.
- Security leadership reporting for the workflow that turns engagement findings into the leadership-ready summaries CISOs read against the cross-asset exposure dashboard.
- Security tool coverage overlap for the catalogue-level coverage matrix across SAST, SCA, DAST, container, IaC, secrets, ASM, CNAPP, identity, OT, pentest, and bug bounty.
- Vulnerability management programme maturity model for the maturity scaffold that frames whether a unified exposure platform, a delivery workspace, or both are the next investment.
- CTEM framework for the Gartner Continuous Threat Exposure Management programme cycle that unified exposure platforms commonly map onto.
When the work is scoped delivery, not enterprise exposure aggregation
Run scoped engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. The unified exposure platform sits alongside, not above. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.