SecPortal vs Intruder
continuous vulnerability scanning vs delivery workspace
Intruder is a continuous vulnerability scanning platform built around an internal estate of assets, ports, and web applications. It runs scheduled external scans, authenticated web checks, network scans against cloud-connected targets, and emerging-threat sweeps when new CVEs land. The buyer is the internal security or vulnerability management team that owns the estate. SecPortal is a different shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI-generated reports, a branded client portal, retesting, and the engagement record live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a continuous scanner aimed at the internal estate to a delivery workspace that scans, records, reports, and ships findings to clients or stakeholders.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security delivery workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, and client portal on one tenant | Continuous external and authenticated vulnerability scanning against an internal asset estate |
| External vulnerability scanning | 16 modules | |
| Authenticated web application scanning (DAST) | ||
| Network and infrastructure scanning | External + authenticated coverage | Cloud connector-driven internal and external scanning |
| Code scanning (SAST and SCA via Semgrep) | ||
| Emerging-threat or rapid CVE rescan | Scheduled rescans (daily/weekly/biweekly/monthly) plus on-demand | Rapid Response and Emerging Threat scans |
| Domain verification before any external scan | DNS TXT or meta tag | Account-bound asset registration |
| Continuous scheduled scanning cadence | ||
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | ||
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | ||
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | ||
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Plugin-derived issue text from underlying scanners | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | Severity classification with CVSS reference | |
| Manual finding entry with full editor | ||
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Imports limited to its own scanner output and integrations | |
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | Stored credentials managed inside the platform | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-scan validates closure | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks | Compliance reports for ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Platform audit logs | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | ||
| Free plan available | ||
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Tier-based per target with annual or monthly commitment |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Target registration plus authenticated scan and cloud connector setup |
| Best fit for | Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, and internal security teams that scan, report, and deliver from one workspace | Internal security and vulnerability management teams that want a managed continuous scanner against the assets they own |
SecPortal vs Intruder: continuous vulnerability scanning vs delivery workspace
Intruder is a SaaS continuous vulnerability scanning platform built around an internal asset estate. It runs scheduled external scans against verified targets, authenticated web checks against running applications, network scans against cloud-connected infrastructure through cloud connectors, and emerging-threat sweeps when new CVEs land. The buyer model assumes an internal security or vulnerability management team that owns the estate and wants the platform to keep watching it as the surface changes.
SecPortal is a different shape. SecPortal is the security delivery and findings workspace for pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, AppSec teams, vulnerability management teams, and internal security functions that run scoped engagements and ship findings to clients or stakeholders. The engagement, the scoping, the manual and scanner findings, the AI-generated report, the branded client portal, the retest, and the invoice all sit inside one workspace. If the question is whether to scan an estate continuously or to deliver assessments and findings as a recurring deliverable, this page is the side-by-side.
Where the continuous scanner model stops for delivery work
These are not Intruder-specific criticisms; they are properties of a continuous scanner platform when the buyer compares it to running scoped client engagements or shipping engagement deliverables to internal application owners on a platform built for delivery.
Built around the asset estate, not the engagement record
Intruder organises work around the targets a customer registers (web applications, IPs, hostnames, cloud assets) and the recurring scan jobs that hit them. There is no concept of a scoped engagement that opens with a kickoff, runs against a defined target list, ships a final report under a client name, schedules a retest, and closes with an invoice. Pentest firms, MSSPs, consultancies, and internal teams that ship findings to a stakeholder under a deliverable contract have to model that lifecycle outside Intruder.
No branded client portal on your subdomain
Intruder issues are reviewed inside the Intruder application. Sharing them with a client typically means the executive report PDF, the scheduled email digest, or the Intruder integration into a separate ticketing system. SecPortal ships a white-label client portal on your tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your firm name rather than the vendor name.
No AI-generated narrative reports
Intruder produces issue records with severity classification, CVSS reference, exploit availability, remediation guidance, and an executive report PDF that summarises the scan estate. It does not generate engagement-shaped executive summaries, narrative technical writeups, or remediation roadmaps from a scoped finding set on demand. SecPortal uses Claude to draft those deliverables from the live engagement findings, including CVSS vectors, evidence, and severity, so the team edits a draft rather than starting from a blank page.
No code scanning inside the same workspace
Intruder scans the external attack surface, the cloud-connected infrastructure, and the running web application through authenticated DAST. It does not run SAST or SCA against a source repository. Engagements that combine external testing with secure code review or supply-chain analysis need a separate code scanning tool and a separate findings workflow to consolidate the output. SecPortal runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against repositories connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth, and the findings sit on the same record as the external and authenticated scan output.
No manual finding entry for non-scanner output
Intruder is a scanner platform. Issues appear in the workspace because Intruder detected them. A pentest also produces findings the scanner cannot detect: business logic flaws, chained exploits, manual SSRF or IDOR proofs, authentication bypasses through application-specific state. SecPortal ships a full manual finding editor with the 300+ finding template library, CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring, and structured evidence so non-scanner findings live on the same record as scanner output.
No invoicing or engagement billing
Intruder is licensed per target with annual or monthly commitment, and the customer is billed by Intruder. There is no built-in invoicing for a firm or consultancy to bill its own clients out of the platform, no Stripe integration to collect payment, and no invoice generation tied to engagement deliverables. SecPortal ships invoicing and Stripe Connect so engagement scope and pricing become invoice line items the client can pay inside the workspace.
What SecPortal adds to the picture
Engagement-shaped workflow
Every scan, finding, retest, and report sits inside an engagement that has a client, a scope, a status, and a delivery date. The model matches the way pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies deliver work, and the way internal teams run scoped assessment cycles for an application owner rather than a continuous stream against the whole estate.
AI report generation
Generate executive summaries, full technical reports, remediation roadmaps, and compliance summaries from the engagement findings with a single click. The AI uses the workspace context: engagement scope, findings, severities, CVSS vectors, and evidence. The report becomes a draft the team edits rather than a blank page.
White-label client portal
Every workspace gets a branded client portal on its own tenant subdomain. Application owners or external clients log in to review findings, track remediation, download reports, and communicate with the team under your brand. Sharing findings does not mean exporting and emailing.
Full-stack scanning on one workspace
External domain scanning runs across 16 modules covering SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation. Authenticated web scanning runs DAST behind a stored credential through cookie, bearer, basic, or form-based authentication. Code scanning runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against a connected repository. One workspace covers the surface, the application, and the source.
300+ finding templates with calibrated severity
A finding template library covers the recurring vulnerability classes a pentest produces: injection, access control, cryptography, configuration, authentication, business logic. Templates carry CVSS 3.1 vectors and remediation guidance so the tester edits the proof rather than rewriting the description. Severity comes from CVSS vector parsing, not from a fixed table.
Continuous monitoring inside the engagement record
Continuous monitoring schedules (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) run scans against verified domains and authenticated targets on the same record as the manual findings, the AI report, and the retest. Continuous coverage sits inside the engagement workflow rather than on a separate console.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Intruder and SecPortal solve adjacent problems for different buyer shapes. The honest framing is that the right tool depends on whether the primary motion is continuous scanning of an internal estate or shipping engagement deliverables to clients, application owners, or business stakeholders.
Intruder fits internal teams that want a managed continuous scanner
If you are an internal security or vulnerability management team that wants a SaaS continuous scanner against your own external surface, your authenticated web applications, and your cloud-connected infrastructure, with rapid rescans when new CVEs land, Intruder is built for that shape of work. The buyer is the team that owns the assets; the user is the analyst who triages the issue feed.
SecPortal fits firms and teams that ship findings as a deliverable
If you are a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, or an in-house security function running scoped engagements (pentests, vulnerability assessments, AppSec reviews, compliance audits) and handing findings to a client or a stakeholder, SecPortal is the delivery workspace. Engagement, findings, scanning, AI reports, branded portal, and invoicing live on one tenant.
When the answer is both
A team that needs continuous monitoring against an internal estate and also runs scoped assessments that ship to application owners, business stakeholders, or external customers can use Intruder for the continuous coverage and SecPortal for the delivery and reporting work. The two are adjacent: the question is whether the primary motion this year is continuous scanning of an estate or shipping engagement deliverables.
How SecPortal scanning compares to Intruder scanning
Both platforms run external scanning against verified targets, both gate scans on proof of ownership, and both support continuous schedules. Where they diverge is what surrounds the scanner. SecPortal treats scanning as one input into an engagement workflow that also includes manual findings, AI-generated reports, retests, and a deliverable. Intruder treats scanning as the platform itself, with continuous monitoring and rapid rescans as the surrounding workflow.
The external scanning feature runs 16 modules across SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation. The authenticated scanning feature adds DAST behind stored credentials through cookie, bearer, basic, or form authentication so issues that only surface inside an authenticated session do not slip past anonymous scanning. The code scanning feature runs SAST and dependency analysis through Semgrep against a repository connected via GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth. The continuous monitoring feature runs daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly scans on a schedule and writes the results back to the same engagement record.
How credentials are handled before any authenticated scan
Authenticated scanning requires credentials to live somewhere durable. SecPortal stores them in an encrypted credential vault with AES-256-GCM, scoped to a verified domain. Every external scan is gated on domain verification through DNS TXT or meta tag so authorisation is provable before any module fires. The same pattern applies to authenticated scans: credentials and target must match the verified domain, and the scan-guard codes (DOMAIN_NOT_VERIFIED, CREDENTIAL_DOMAIN_MISMATCH, AUTH_NOT_ALLOWED) refuse to run when the chain of evidence does not hold.
Why delivery teams pick SecPortal over a continuous scanner
- Move from a per-target continuous scanner licence to a workspace that holds engagements, findings, AI reports, retests, and a branded portal on one record
- Generate executive summaries, technical writeups, and remediation roadmaps from engagement findings rather than writing them outside the platform after every scan cycle
- Hand application owners or clients a branded portal on your subdomain instead of the executive PDF or scheduled email digest from a vendor-branded console
- Bring code scanning into the same workspace as external and authenticated scanning instead of stitching together SAST and SCA output from a separate tool
- Capture manual findings (business logic, chained proofs, IDOR walkthroughs, authentication bypasses) alongside scanner output rather than tracking them in a side document
- Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit rather than relying on the next continuous scan to confirm the fix
- Map findings across 21 frameworks including OWASP, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, and NIS2 from one workspace
- Bill the engagement from the same platform with Stripe Connect rather than running invoicing in a separate accounting tool
- Start on a free plan and pay for the seats and storage you actually use rather than committing to a per-target tier up front
From scan to deliverable
The output of a scanner is the beginning of a deliverable, not the end. SecPortal turns scan results into draft findings, the tester triages and validates them, the findings management layer holds the consolidated record with CVSS vectors, evidence, and remediation, and the AI reports feature generates the executive and technical narrative the recipient receives. The branded client portal is where the deliverable lands; the scanner result triage workflow covers how raw scanner output becomes a calibrated finding before it is promoted onto the canonical record.
For internal security teams that already run a continuous scanner and want to operationalise the output into engagement records and remediation tracking, the scanner-to-ticket handoff governance workflow and the remediation tracking workflow cover how scanner findings move from detection to closure with named owners, SLA tiers, and an audit trail. The importing third-party scanner results guide documents the verified Nessus, Burp Suite, and CSV import paths if the team wants to keep its existing scanner and consolidate findings on the SecPortal record.
Adjacent comparisons
If the evaluation is between Intruder and other vulnerability scanning, attack surface monitoring, or vulnerability management platforms, the comparisons below cover the same buying decision from different angles.
- SecPortal vs Detectify for the external attack surface monitoring comparison.
- SecPortal vs Tenable.io for the enterprise exposure management comparison.
- SecPortal vs Qualys for the enterprise vulnerability management comparison.
- SecPortal vs Rapid7 for the InsightVM and InsightAppSec internal SecOps comparison.
- SecPortal vs Nessus for the network vulnerability scanner-only comparison.
- SecPortal vs Microsoft Defender VM for the Microsoft 365 endpoint-resident scanner comparison.
- SecPortal vs Acunetix for the dedicated web vulnerability scanner comparison.
When the work is delivery, not just continuous scanning
Run scoped engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. Continuous scanning sits inside the workflow, not above it. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.