For DevSecOps teams
who run security across the pipeline

A DevSecOps platform built around the pipeline and the engineers who run it

DevSecOps work usually spans a SAST tool in the pipeline, a separate SCA scanner, an authenticated DAST tool that someone configured once, an external attack surface scanner, and a stack of external pentest PDFs that arrive twice a year. Each system has its own severity model, its own triage queue, its own set of integrations, and its own way of getting ignored when the queue grows. The cost is not just the licensing; it is the hours every week that disappear into reconciling findings, deduplicating noise, and chasing fixes across systems that do not share a definition of done.

SecPortal gives DevSecOps and platform security teams one workspace for SAST, SCA, authenticated DAST, external scans, and external pentest findings. Findings carry CVSS scores from the moment they are opened, OWASP mapping is built in, engineers see the work assigned to them through a read-only portal view, and AI handles the reporting that sits on top. The platform scales from a one-person security function inside a product company to a platform security team supporting multiple engineering organisations, without adding administrative overhead.

DevSecOps capabilities in one workspace

How DevSecOps teams operate the programme inside SecPortal

DevSecOps is most effective when the team owns one operational picture rather than five partial views. SecPortal supports the full operating model rather than a single phase of it.

From pipeline finding to verified close, with engineering in the loop

Closing findings is the part of the DevSecOps programme that drives risk reduction. The triage flow runs the same way regardless of whether the finding came from a SAST scan, an SCA scan, an authenticated DAST run, or an external pentest, so engineers learn one workflow rather than five.

1. 1A finding lands with a CVSS vector, a severity, evidence, OWASP mapping where it applies, and concrete remediation guidance from a 300+ template library. Engineers see what to fix and why before opening the file.
2. 2Assign an owner, set the SLA window by severity, and tag the affected service or repository. Critical and high findings get tighter windows; lower severity items can be deferred or accepted with a written reason recorded against the finding.
3. 3Engineers update fix status, attach pull request links or commit hashes, and ask clarifying questions inside the same record rather than across Slack threads and Jira comments. The audit trail is automatic.
4. 4Run a retest, attach the result to the original finding, and close it as verified, partially fixed, or regressed. The history shows the full path from open to verified close in one place rather than across a report PDF and a ticketing system.

DevSecOps versus AppSec on the same platform

DevSecOps and AppSec functions share tooling but not scope. AppSec teams generally own application-layer security across product engineering: authenticated DAST, threat modelling, secure design review, and bug bounty triage. DevSecOps teams generally own the pipeline and the platform: CI scanning, secret detection, dependency hygiene, container hardening, and the operating model that makes security testing continuous rather than release-blocking. On SecPortal, the two functions share the same findings database, the same CVSS model, and the same remediation flow, so a finding does not change identity when it crosses from pipeline to product. If you also support an AppSec function, the AppSec teams page covers that side of the workspace in detail. If your remit is closer to operating the scanner fleet, the credential vault, the schedules, and the access model that the rest of the security organisation depends on, the security engineering teams page covers the platform-as-product perspective on the same workspace. If your remit is the developer platform itself (golden paths, paved roads, IDP scaffolds, CI/CD glue), and security testing is one of several non-functional concerns the platform has to make easy, the platform engineering teams page covers how SecPortal slots into the developer platform as a service rather than as a fleet of custom CI integrations.

Where to start

Most DevSecOps teams adopt the platform in three phases. First, connect the Git provider and run SAST and SCA against the repositories that matter most. Second, layer authenticated DAST onto staging or production for the services that matter most. Third, consolidate external pentest deliverables, attack surface monitoring, and quarterly reporting into the same record. The capability and workflow pages explain each phase in detail.

• SAST and SCA scanning across your repositories are covered in the DevSecOps scanning use case and the code scanning feature page. The OAuth connection layer that lets the scanner read your source, with encrypted tokens and an explicit per-repository allow-list, is covered in the repository connections feature page. Deeper context lives in the SAST vs SCA guide and the DevSecOps enterprise guide.
• Authenticated testing behind the login screen is covered in the authenticated scanning feature page, the web application testing use case, and the dynamic application security testing guide.
• Continuous monitoring, scheduled scans, and the operating model that makes security testing continuous live in the continuous monitoring feature page and the continuous security monitoring guide.
• OWASP coverage and pipeline framework mapping live on the OWASP framework page, with the wider operating context in the OWASP Top 10 explainer.
• Findings deduplication, prioritisation, and remediation tracking across SAST, SCA, DAST, and external pentest results are covered in the remediation tracking use case, findings deduplication guide, and vulnerability prioritisation framework.

SecPortal is built for DevSecOps teams that want one platform for the pipeline, the deployed services, and the external work that comes back as PDFs. Engineering teams get a clearer signal, leadership gets faster reports, and the security function gets back the hours that used to disappear into reconciling findings across five tools.

Teams currently weighing whether to stand up a self-hosted findings hub or run a managed platform should read the SecPortal vs DefectDojo comparison, which covers the operational footprint of running an open source orchestration tool versus letting a managed platform absorb the database, patching, MFA, and audit-trail work.