For banking and fintech
security consultancies
Run PCI DSS, SWIFT CSP, NIS2, DORA, and threat-led testing engagements as structured records, not as zipped report drafts. Tag findings against the requirement the regulator already tracks, deliver through a branded portal scoped per financial-services client, and keep the evidence chain intact through the next supervisory review.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
A platform built for the firms that test banks and fintechs
Penetration testing firms that serve banking and fintech clients carry a different operating burden than firms that test general SaaS or enterprise IT. The work touches regulated entities, the deliverables sit alongside PCI DSS attestations, SWIFT CSP self-assessments, DORA threat-led testing requirements, and NIS2 obligations, the report has to map findings back to specific regulator-tracked controls, and the evidence chain has to survive a supervisory review, an internal audit, an acquirer due-diligence cycle, or a payments scheme assessment without a missing link. Most consultancies still run this delivery on a notes app, a screenshot folder, a shared drive of report drafts, and a ticket queue that loses context the moment an engagement closes.
SecPortal gives banking and fintech focused pentest firms one workspace for engagements, findings, evidence, retests, branded delivery, and invoicing. Findings carry CVSS scores from the moment they are opened, requirement-level tagging is part of the workflow, the client portal scopes payment-system and treasury evidence behind authenticated access, and the AI-assisted reporting drafts the requirement-aligned writeup the buyer is expecting. Whether the firm services a regional bank, a digital-only challenger, a payments processor, a card scheme partner, an open-banking API provider, or a panel of third-party providers inside a banking ecosystem, the platform scales without adding administrative overhead.
Capabilities banking and fintech pentest firms actually use
Engagement records that carry the regulator context
Each banking or fintech engagement opens with the regulated entity, the supervisor or regulator the work is being evidenced for, the in-scope payment, treasury, or core banking systems, the data classes the testing touches, and the agreed handling rules attached to the record. The record persists after the engagement closes, so the next test against the same client starts from the documented prior context rather than a re-onboarded blank page.
Findings tagged to PCI DSS, SWIFT CSP, NIS2, and DORA
Log findings with CVSS 3.1 vectors, severity, and evidence, and tag them against the PCI DSS requirement, the SWIFT CSCF principle, the NIS2 obligation, the DORA testing requirement, or the ISO 27001 Annex A control the issue impacts. The exported report carries the requirement reference, so the regulated entity can attach the finding to its own evidence pack without re-keying every line.
Branded portal scoped per financial-services client
Each banking, payments, or fintech client receives a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. Reports, findings, retest evidence, and remediation status sit behind authenticated access scoped to the regulated entity. Exploit evidence against payment systems, treasury platforms, and open-banking APIs stays off the file-share links that most consultancies still default to.
Retests paired to the original finding
When the client closes a vulnerability, the retest pairs to the same finding rather than opening a new record. Closure evidence sits with the original capture date, so the audit trail shows when the issue was found, when remediation took effect, and which tester verified it. Internal audit leads, supervisory examiners, and external auditors can all walk the same trail without reconstructing context from scratch.
AI-assisted reporting tuned to financial-services buyers
Generate executive summaries, technical writeups, and remediation roadmaps from the live findings record. Banking and fintech buyers expect a deliverable that ties technical detail to the requirement their compliance and risk teams already track. The AI generates a draft against the tagged record, so the senior tester edits a draft instead of typing from a blank page on the day the engagement closes.
Multi-framework evidence from one record
The same finding can be tagged against PCI DSS, SWIFT CSP, NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, and NIST 800-53 simultaneously when the client touches multiple regimes. One engagement record produces coordinated evidence trails for each framework, so a regional bank or a multi-jurisdiction payments fintech does not commission four parallel write-ups against the same exposure.
How a financial-services pentest practice runs inside SecPortal
Banking and fintech pentest delivery is most defensible when one operating picture covers scope, evidence, finding-to-requirement mapping, retest verification, and the report. SecPortal supports the full delivery rather than a single phase of it.
- Open the engagement against the right client record so the regulator reference, in-scope systems, data classes, and agreed handling rules are documented before any testing starts.
- Run external scans, authenticated scans against web and API surfaces, code scans, and manual testing under one engagement, with the findings consolidated to a single record rather than scattered across separate tool exports.
- Track every finding through open, in-progress, fix-pending, retest-pending, and verified-closed states with a date and actor on each transition, so the audit trail covers what supervisors and internal auditors expect to see.
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation views from the same source data, so the same finding base produces the right artefact for the CISO, the security engineer, the compliance lead, and the supervisory contact at the client.
- Map findings to the PCI DSS requirement, the SWIFT CSCF principle, the NIS2 obligation, or the DORA testing requirement on the same record they live on, with ISO 27001 and NIST 800-53 tagging where the engagement scope demands them.
- Invoice the engagement against the same record the work was tracked against, so billing closes on the same source of truth the deliverable closed on.
From engagement kickoff to verified close, on one record
The leverage in financial-services pentest delivery is the durability of the audit chain after the engagement closes. SecPortal runs a single delivery flow that the next assessment, the next retest, and the next supervisory visit can build against without reconstructing context.
- 1Open the financial-services engagement with regulated entity, regulator reference, in-scope systems, scope statement, rules of engagement, testers, and dates stamped against the record. The rules-of-engagement template populates the standard sections; the engagement record holds the bespoke financial-services context.
- 2Run the testing programme inside the engagement record. External scans, authenticated DAST against web and API surfaces, SAST and SCA via the Git provider connection, and manual testing all consolidate to the same findings database, with raw outputs attached to the finding they support.
- 3Tag each finding against the PCI DSS requirement, the SWIFT CSCF principle, the NIS2 obligation, or the DORA testing requirement it impacts as it is logged. Add ISO 27001 and NIST 800-53 tags where the client scope demands them. The tagging is part of the testing workflow, not a post-engagement reconciliation step.
- 4Generate the technical report, executive summary, and remediation roadmap with AI assistance from the live record. The deliverable lands in the client portal alongside the underlying finding-level evidence, so the report and the source-of-truth point at the same data.
- 5Run retests after the client remediates, attach verification evidence to the same finding, and either close the issue with a status change actor recorded automatically or revert to open with regression notes captured in place. The audit chain stays intact for supervisory review and internal audit activities.
Where banking and fintech pentest firms typically start
Most financial-services-focused firms adopt the platform in three phases: bring the active client list and engagement records under one workspace, layer in finding-to-requirement tagging and branded portal delivery, then consolidate retests, AI-assisted reporting, and invoicing onto the same record. The relevant framework, capability, and workflow pages explain each phase in detail.
- The PCI DSS context that card-handling clients expect lives in the PCI DSS framework page, the messaging-system control overlay sits in the SWIFT CSP framework page, and the EU resilience overlay covers both the DORA framework page and the NIS2 framework page.
- For threat-led testing engagements that financial supervisors increasingly request, the TIBER-EU framework page, the CBEST framework page, the HKMA C-RAF framework page, the MAS TRM framework page, the FFIEC framework page, and the RBI Cyber Security Framework page cover how regulator-driven red-team and structured testing work (including iCAST under HKMA C-RAF in Hong Kong, the MAS TRM testing cadence in Singapore, the FFIEC IT Examination Handbook expectations applied by US federal banking regulators, and the RBI VAPT and CSITE supervisory expectations applied across the India financial population) fits the same engagement and findings model.
- The core engagement and findings workflow lives in the penetration testing use case, with onboarding for new financial-services clients covered in the pentest client onboarding workflow. API-heavy fintech estates lean on the API security testing use case for the authenticated DAST coverage.
- The finding-tagging model that produces requirement-aligned reports sits in the findings management feature, with the multi-framework mapping covered by the compliance tracking feature.
- Branded delivery scoped per regulated client lives in the client portal feature, with the AI-drafted writeup produced from the live record covered by the AI reports feature. Authenticated DAST against web and API surfaces sits in the authenticated scanning feature.
- The retest workflow that pairs verification to the original finding is covered in the retesting use case, and the wider report-delivery pattern is documented in the pentest report delivery use case.
SecPortal is built for pentest firms that want one platform for the whole financial-services delivery: live engagements, requirement-tagged findings, evidence, retests, branded portals, AI-assisted reporting, and invoicing. Banking and fintech clients get a deliverable that ties to the requirements their compliance and risk teams already track, and the firm gets back the hours that used to disappear into post-engagement document production and tagging reconciliation.
If your firm is structured as a smaller partner-led practice between two and ten testers, the SecPortal for boutique security firms page covers the operating model that fits a specialist consultancy. If your firm runs a broader multi-vertical book of business, the SecPortal for cybersecurity firms page covers the multi-client delivery model without the financial-services-specific framing. Firms that also serve healthcare clients can read the SecPortal for healthcare penetration testing firms page for the HIPAA-aligned variant of the same delivery model.
For broader context on how financial-services pentest deliverables hold up after the engagement closes, the remediation tracking use case and the aging pentest findings research cover what happens after the report ships and the client starts working through the requirements the engagement surfaced.
The problems you face
And how SecPortal solves each one.
Reports do not map findings to the PCI DSS requirement, the SWIFT CSCF principle, or the DORA testing obligation that the client has to evidence
Tag each finding against the requirement it impacts at the moment it is logged. PCI DSS requirements, SWIFT CSCF principles, and ISO 27001 controls coexist on the same record, so the firm can produce one engagement record and three coordinated evidence packs instead of writing three parallel reports.
Threat-led testing engagements such as TIBER-EU and CBEST need an evidence chain that survives a supervisory review months after the test closed
Findings carry CVSS vectors, evidence attachments, retest verification, and an immutable activity log of who triaged what and when. Threat-led engagements close with the closure letter and the attestation linked to the same record, so the firm can hand the regulator a continuous trail rather than a folder of static PDFs.
Email and shared drives are the wrong delivery channel for findings that include exploit evidence against payment systems, core banking platforms, or open-banking APIs
Each financial-services client gets a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. Reports, findings, retest evidence, and remediation status sit behind authenticated access scoped to the regulated entity, not on generic file-share links that age out and leak through forwarded threads.
Penetration testers, red-team operators, and code reviewers each produce findings in different tools and the consolidated picture lives in a spreadsheet
External scans, authenticated DAST against web and API surfaces, SAST and SCA via the Git provider connection, and manually logged red-team findings all consolidate on the same engagement record. Deduplication and CVSS scoring run across the consolidated set, so the engagement closes with one defensible findings list rather than four overlapping exports.
Retests after remediation get treated as new engagements, breaking the audit chain a financial regulator expects to see
Retests pair to the original finding rather than opening a new record. Closure evidence sits with the original capture date, so the trail shows when the issue was found, when remediation took effect, and which tester verified it, all on one record the client can hand to a regulator or to an internal audit lead.
Multi-jurisdiction financial-services clients need evidence for PCI DSS, SWIFT CSP, NIS2, DORA, and ISO 27001 from a single test cycle
Compliance tracking lets one finding be tagged against multiple requirements at once. The same engagement record produces evidence aligned to PCI DSS requirements, SWIFT CSCF controls, NIS2 obligations, DORA testing requirements, and ISO 27001 Annex A, so a regional bank or a payments fintech does not pay for four separate reports against the same exposure.
Run banking and fintech pentest delivery on one platform
PCI DSS, SWIFT CSP, NIS2, DORA aligned findings, branded portals, and invoicing on one workspace. Free plan to start.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.