SecPortal vs Rezilion
runtime exploitable validation vs security testing workspace
Rezilion is a runtime-aware vulnerability management platform that anchors on filtering known CVEs against actual loaded code, library reachability, and live process state inside running container, virtual machine, and host workloads. The mechanic is to ingest the package inventory from connected images and hosts, build an SBOM, observe which libraries and functions are actually loaded and called at runtime, and downgrade the priority of CVEs whose vulnerable code paths never load. The buyer is an enterprise vulnerability management or AppSec team that already operates Snyk, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, or similar package-level scanners and wants a validator layer that filters their backlog against runtime evidence so engineering owners only patch what is exploitable in production. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, native external scanning across 16 modules, authenticated DAST across 17 modules behind stored credentials, and SAST plus dependency analysis through Semgrep on connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories all live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for enterprise buyers comparing a runtime-aware exploitable-vulnerability validation product to a security testing and remediation workspace that scans, records, reports, and delivers findings on its own.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
| Feature | SecPortal | Rezilion |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Security testing and remediation workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, branded portal, and engagement record on one tenant | Runtime-aware exploitable vulnerability validation that filters package-level CVE findings against loaded library and function reachability inside running workloads and pushes the validated backlog to engineering owners |
| Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables | Asset, image, host, and SBOM model rather than scoped engagement with a kickoff and a deliverable | |
| Client model with onboarding, contacts, and access control | Internal asset owner and image owner model rather than external client onboarding | |
| Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain | ||
| Runtime sensor or agent inside container and VM workloads | Rezilion deploys a runtime sensor inside container and virtual machine workloads to observe loaded libraries, called functions, and live process state | |
| Runtime-aware reachability and function-level call graph analysis | Core mechanic; vulnerable code paths that never load at runtime are downgraded in priority through the validator engine | |
| SBOM ingest and dependency inventory across container images and hosts | SBOM generation and ingest is one of the platform foundations and feeds the validator engine | |
| Live patching and runtime patch orchestration | Rezilion documents live patching workflows that pair the validated backlog to patch orchestration on running workloads | |
| Native external vulnerability scanning (16 modules: SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, CVE correlation) | ||
| Native authenticated web DAST (17 modules) | ||
| Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM) | ||
| SAST scanning | Semgrep-powered SAST on connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories | |
| Software composition analysis (SCA) | Dependency analysis through Semgrep on connected repositories | Package-inventory SCA filtered against runtime reachability rather than a primary discovery scanner; Rezilion ingests SCA findings from connected scanners and applies the validator layer |
| Manual finding entry with full editor | Findings originate from connected scanner ingest and the runtime sensor observation rather than from manual entry by a tester | |
| AI-powered narrative report generation (executive, technical, remediation) | Console dashboards, validator-status views, and exportable backlog rather than engagement-shaped executive, technical, and remediation deliverables | |
| 300+ finding templates with remediation guidance | Per-CVE remediation guidance through the validator output rather than a curated finding template library for manual engagement work | |
| CVSS 3.1 vector parsing and auto-scoring | CVSS is one input to the runtime-aware prioritisation model; the prioritisation output is the validator-adjusted backlog rather than a per-finding CVSS-only ranking | |
| Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV) | Connector-driven ingest from package-level scanners (Snyk, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, and similar) rather than from external scanner CSV exports | |
| Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly) | Cadence is determined by the connected scanner schedule and the runtime sensor observation cycle rather than by an in-product scan schedule per target | |
| Retest workflow paired to original finding | Re-evaluation through the next validator cycle on the same asset or image rather than an engagement-shaped retest record | |
| Exception register with eight-field decision chain | Per-finding accept-and-suppress scoped to the asset and validator rationale rather than an engagement-shaped per-finding decision chain | |
| Compliance framework templates | 21 frameworks including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight | Per-finding categorisation against package-level CVE references and CWE through the validator output; engagement-shaped framework deliverables are not the primary lane |
| Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments for engagements | ||
| Activity audit trail with CSV export | Asset, image, and validator audit logs inside the Rezilion console | |
| MFA enforcement on every workspace | SSO and IdP-driven controls | |
| Free plan available | Sales-led commercial pricing rather than a published free tier | |
| Pricing model | Free, Pro, Team | Sales-led with annual commitment and asset, image, or workload-count licensing depending on deployment shape |
| Setup time | 2 minutes | Runtime sensor deployment across container and VM workloads, scanner connector configuration, SBOM ingest configuration, and validator policy tuning |
| Best fit for | AppSec teams, internal security teams, vulnerability management teams, product security teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that scan, report, and deliver findings from one workspace | Enterprise vulnerability management and AppSec teams that already license package-level scanners (Snyk, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS) at scale, operate substantial container and VM workload estates, and want a validator layer that filters their backlog against runtime evidence before patching |
SecPortal vs Rezilion: delivery workspace vs runtime-aware exploitable validator
Rezilion is a runtime-aware vulnerability management platform that anchors on filtering known CVEs against actual loaded code, library reachability, and live process state inside running container, virtual machine, and host workloads. The mechanic is to ingest the package inventory from connected scanners (Snyk, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, and similar), build an SBOM, observe which libraries and functions are actually loaded and called at runtime through a deployed sensor, and downgrade the priority of CVEs whose vulnerable code paths never load. The buyer assumption is that package-level scanning is already in place at enterprise scale and the bottleneck is the volume of findings that are technically present in dependency manifests but never reachable in production.
SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security testing and remediation workspace that carries the engagement, the findings, the scanning, the AI report, the branded client portal, and the invoice all on one tenant. The buyer is a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, a consultancy, an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, a product security team, or an in-house security function that ships scoped work to clients or stakeholders. If you are comparing a runtime-aware validator layer above a stack of existing scanner contracts to a delivery and remediation workspace that scans, reports, and delivers on its own, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the runtime-aware and risk-based vulnerability management category often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs Nucleus Security, SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber, SecPortal vs Phoenix Security, SecPortal vs Kenna Security, and SecPortal vs Snyk.
Where Rezilion stops for delivery and engagement-shaped security work
These are not Rezilion-specific criticisms; they are properties of a runtime-aware validator layer when you compare it to running scoped engagements or a scanner-plus-findings programme on a single workspace.
Built as a runtime-aware validator layer above existing package-level scanners
Rezilion is a runtime-aware vulnerability management platform that anchors on filtering known CVEs against actual loaded code, library reachability, and live process state inside running container, virtual machine, and host workloads. The mechanic is to ingest the package inventory from connected scanners (Snyk, Wiz, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, and similar), build an SBOM, observe which libraries and functions are actually loaded and called at runtime through a deployed sensor, and downgrade the priority of CVEs whose vulnerable code paths never load. The buyer assumption is that package-level scanning is already in place at enterprise scale and the bottleneck is the volume of findings that are technically present in dependency manifests but never reachable in production. SecPortal is the opposite shape: scanning, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, and the engagement record live inside one workspace.
No engagement, scope, or deliverable model
Rezilion is organised around the asset, the container image, the host, the SBOM, and the validator output rather than around a scoped engagement with a kickoff, a defined target list, a final report, and a closure date. If the work you ship is a pentest, a vulnerability assessment, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, or a compliance audit with a contract scope and a deliverable, Rezilion does not carry that record. The validator output is a backlog filtered by runtime evidence, not a deliverable shaped for a client, an auditor, or a board.
No branded client portal on your tenant subdomain
Rezilion output lives inside the Rezilion console. There is no white-label portal a security firm, an MSSP, or an in-house security team can hand to an external client or to a stakeholder business unit under their own brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on the tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.
No native scanning of external attack surface, authenticated web applications, or repository code
Rezilion is a validator and orchestration layer above package-level scanners and runtime sensors. It does not run its own external vulnerability scan of internet-facing assets across SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, and technology fingerprinting. It does not run authenticated web DAST behind stored credentials against a verified domain. It does not run SAST or dependency analysis directly against a connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repository on the workspace itself. The buyer is expected to license those scanners separately and feed their output into the validator. SecPortal runs 16 external scanner modules, 17 authenticated web scanner modules, and SAST plus SCA via Semgrep against connected repositories on the same workspace as findings, reports, and delivery.
No AI-generated executive summaries, technical writeups, or remediation narratives shaped for an engagement
Rezilion produces validator dashboards, prioritisation views, runtime evidence trails, and patch orchestration workflows from ingested scanner output and live sensor observation. The deliverable is the filtered backlog. The platform does not draft executive summaries, technical pentest writeups, or narrative remediation roadmaps that are shaped for a client read, an audit committee read, or a board read. SecPortal uses Claude to draft executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record so the deliverable goes out without separate writeup time.
Sales-led procurement and workload-count or asset-based licensing
Rezilion pricing is sales-led with a contract floor that fits enterprise procurement: workload count, container image count, asset count, or sensor footprint depending on deployment shape. There is no published price list, no free tier, and no self-service path from sign-up to a real engagement. The buyer enters a procurement cycle that includes a demo, a scoping call, a scanner-integration plan, a runtime sensor deployment plan, and an annual commitment before the validator produces value. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.
How runtime-aware prioritisation actually shows up on the operator queue
Runtime-aware vulnerability management is a useful framing for SCA backlog prioritisation, but the buyer should be clear-eyed about what runtime reachability filtering gives the programme and what it costs to operate alongside a separate finding record. The contrast below is between a runtime-aware filter on a package-level CVE backlog and a finding record on an engagement record with severity, exception, retest, and audit trail on the same workspace.
Runtime-aware validators downgrade CVEs whose vulnerable code never loads
Rezilion is part of a category of runtime-aware vulnerability management platforms that includes Endor Labs, Oligo Security, Lacework reachability features, and Snyk reachability (when paired with Snyk Container or Snyk Open Source reachability). The shared mechanic is that package-level CVE findings from SCA scanners list more findings than engineering can patch, that many of those findings sit in libraries whose vulnerable functions never load at runtime, and that filtering the backlog through observed runtime state reduces the patch queue to what is genuinely reachable. The economic value comes from removing the noise that a static package-level scan generates.
A delivery and remediation workspace owns the finding record from intake to closure
SecPortal does not assume that filtering a package-level CVE backlog through runtime reachability is the right shape for the work. The workspace runs its own external, authenticated, and code scanning, holds the finding record, supports manual entry from a tester or a reviewer, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, captures the exception decision with an eight-field chain, runs the retest against the same finding identity, and ships the deliverable through a branded portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, an external attack surface programme, and a compliance audit. The finding lives where the work is done, not in a validator console that ends at the filtered backlog.
The right answer depends on whether scanners and sensors are already in place at enterprise scale
If the vulnerability management programme already operates Snyk Open Source, Snyk Container, Wiz Vulnerability Findings, Tenable, Qualys, GHAS, and several others across a container and VM estate at enterprise scale, the SBOM is already being maintained, the runtime sensor can be deployed on the workload footprint, and the patch volume is dominated by SCA CVEs whose reachability is contested between security and engineering, a runtime-aware validator like Rezilion is the right shape. If the team needs the scanners themselves, the engagement record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice on one workspace without a stack of separate scanner contracts and a deployed runtime sensor, a delivery and remediation workspace like SecPortal is the right shape. Both can be true for different parts of an enterprise programme; one is the right shape for a given buyer at a given time.
Validator output versus closure-grade audit record
A validator decides which CVEs are reachable. An audit record decides which findings closed, when, against which evidence, by which named owner, under which exception. The two artefacts are not interchangeable.
Validator output is not the same as a closure-grade audit record
A runtime-aware validator gives the programme a defensible answer to the patch-versus-no-patch question on a specific CVE in a specific workload at a specific point in time. It does not produce the audit record that pairs the original finding identity, the named owner, the severity rationale, the exception decision chain (if applicable), the retest evidence, and the timestamped state changes against a contract or programme scope. The validator artefact and the audit artefact are different shapes and they sit at different points of the remediation lifecycle.
SecPortal captures the finding identity, the owner, the severity, the exception, the retest, and the timestamped activity log on one record
SecPortal records the finding identity (template reference, scanner module, asset reference, engagement reference, control reference), the named owner from the team management catalogue, the severity through CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, the exception decision through the eight-field decision chain on the override record, the retest verification status against the original finding identity, and the timestamped state changes against named users through the activity log with CSV export. The closure record is read against the original finding identity rather than reconstructed from a validator output snapshot.
The record lives where the operator runs and the auditor reads
In SecPortal the engagement record is the same record the operator works on, the auditor reads at fieldwork time, the client downloads from the branded portal, and the leadership view regenerates from. In a Rezilion deployment the validator output lives in the Rezilion console, the work happens in the underlying scanner consoles and downstream in the patch orchestration system, and the audit trail spans the scanner consoles, the Rezilion console, and the patch system. Reconciling those records at audit time is part of the recurring operating cost of a validator-layer architecture.
Who each platform is the right fit for
Rezilion and SecPortal solve different problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether you are filtering a package-level CVE backlog through runtime reachability or running scoped engagements and findings on one workspace with native scanning of your own.
Rezilion fits enterprise vulnerability management teams with substantial package-level scanner output and container or VM workload runtime presence
If you are an enterprise vulnerability management team, the AppSec function ships Snyk, Wiz, GHAS, and similar package-level scanners against the container and VM estate, the backlog is dominated by CVE findings whose reachability is contested, and engineering owners push back on patching libraries whose vulnerable functions never load at runtime, Rezilion was built for that validator shape. The buyer assumption is one runtime-aware filter layer that sits above an existing scanner stack plus a deployed runtime sensor footprint across the workloads.
SecPortal fits teams who want scanning, findings, reports, and delivery in one workspace
If you are an AppSec team, a vulnerability management team, an internal security team, a product security team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a consultancy that wants the scanner, the finding record, the AI report, the branded portal, and the invoice all on one tenant, SecPortal carries that lifecycle without forcing the team to license separate package-level scanners and deploy a separate runtime sensor before the workspace produces value.
SecPortal fits buyers who deliver findings to clients, business unit owners, or auditors
If you ship reports to external clients, internal business unit owners, audit committees, or external auditors, and every finding, retest, remediation thread, exception decision, and report download has to live under your brand rather than inside a validator console that engineering teams operate from, SecPortal is the workspace that holds that record across engagements and across years. Findings can still be imported from Nessus, Burp Suite, or CSV when scanners or validator output from outside SecPortal are part of the picture.
Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle
SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor, no per-asset licensing model, no runtime sensor footprint planning, and no enterprise sales call required before you can run a real engagement.
SecPortal Free
Free forever
1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.
SecPortal Pro
From $149/month
All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.
SecPortal Team
From $299/month
Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.
Why teams pick SecPortal over Rezilion
- Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record instead of an open-ended validator backlog above a stack of package-level scanners
- Scan internally with 16 external modules, 17 authenticated modules, and SAST plus SCA code scanning rather than ingesting a separately licensed scanner stack into a validator console
- Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record so the audit, client, and leadership read regenerates from the same record
- Deliver findings through a branded client portal on your tenant subdomain instead of through a vendor validator console
- Pair every retest to the original finding identity so the closure record holds up against an audit citation rather than against a validator snapshot
- Document CVSS 3.1, exception rationale, asset reference, and severity calibration on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or a business unit owner
- Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
- Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault rather than passing credentials between a scanner console and a separate validator deployment
- Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
- Start on the free plan and upgrade without procurement, an asset-count audit, a sensor deployment plan, or an enterprise sales call
Honest scope: what SecPortal does not do
SecPortal is a security testing and remediation workspace. It is not a runtime sensor, an SBOM platform, a patch orchestration tool, or a package-level CVE consolidator. The capabilities below are intentionally out of scope.
- SecPortal does not deploy a runtime sensor inside container, virtual machine, or host workloads to observe loaded libraries, called functions, or live process state.
- SecPortal does not generate or ingest an SBOM across the container image and host estate as a primary inventory mechanic; package-level dependency analysis on connected repositories runs through Semgrep at code-scan time.
- SecPortal does not orchestrate live patching or rebootless patch deployment on running workloads; the workspace records the finding, captures the closure verification through the retest, and leaves patch orchestration to the operating system, the container platform, or a dedicated patch management tool.
- SecPortal does not ship packaged push connectors into Jira, ServiceNow, Slack, PagerDuty, SIEM, SOAR, GRC, or CMDB platforms; integration into those systems is the workspace consumer responsibility.
- SecPortal does not consolidate a multi-scanner backlog through threat intelligence weighting; CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, EPSS lookup, and KEV referencing are first-class data on the finding record, but a unified composite risk score across many connected scanners is not the primary lane.
- SecPortal does not replace a separately licensed package-level scanner stack; SCA findings from outside scanners can be imported through CSV or the bulk-finding-import path when those scanners remain part of the enterprise programme.
Related reading
If you are evaluating how to run an in-house vulnerability management programme or a security testing and remediation operation rather than pay for a validator layer above an existing scanner stack, the pages below cover the workflows, signals, and adjacent comparisons that come up most often in enterprise procurement.
- Reachability analysis for vulnerability prioritisation for the operational walkthrough of the runtime reachability mechanic Rezilion is built around, including limits and failure modes.
- Risk-based vulnerability management buyer guide for the category-level evaluation guide that covers signal inputs, the four product shapes, RFP-ready criteria, and when RBVM fits.
- CVE and EPSS enrichment workflow for the discipline that pairs the public exploit signal to the engagement record without a runtime sensor.
- Security finding ownership and routing for the workflow that pairs a named owner, an SLA, and a routing rule to every finding regardless of source.
- Container image vulnerability remediation workflow for the per-image CVE lifecycle that captures the engagement record alongside an external validator layer.
- Vulnerability remediation campaign management for the campaign artefact that drives a bounded patch programme to verified closure.
- CISA KEV catalog guide for the strongest exploitation signal a vulnerability management programme reads alongside or in place of runtime reachability.
- EPSS score explained for the public exploit-likelihood signal that complements CVSS severity on every finding record.
- Vulnerability remediation throughput research for the cycle-time stages a programme should report alongside any reachability or validator score.
- Security tool coverage overlap research for the scanner-stack coverage map that a validator layer does not change.
- Findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, severity calibration, and 300+ finding templates that hold the audit record.
- Code scanning for SAST plus dependency analysis through Semgrep on connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories.
- External scanning with 16 modules covering SSL, headers, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation.
- SecPortal vs Nucleus Security for the RBVM consolidator alternative buyers in the runtime-aware category often evaluate alongside.
- SecPortal vs Vulcan Cyber for the cyber-risk-based prioritisation alternative inside the same buyer evaluation.
- SecPortal vs Phoenix Security for the risk-based ASPM orchestrator alternative inside the same buyer evaluation.
- SecPortal vs Snyk for the package-level scanner pairing that a runtime-aware validator typically ingests.
- SecPortal for vulnerability management teams for the in-house find, track, fix, and verify audience overview.
- SecPortal for AppSec teams for the product security audience that ships SAST, SCA, and DAST findings into a single workspace.
- SecPortal for CISOs for the security leadership read that regenerates from the same record the operator runs.
When the work is scoped engagement delivery and remediation tracking, not runtime backlog validation above existing scanners
Run scoped AppSec, pentest, and vulnerability management engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. SAST plus dependency analysis plus DAST plus external scanning live on the same engagement record. Pair alongside a Rezilion runtime validator deployment when the buyer also owns a separately licensed package-level scanner stack. Start free.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.