Security code reviews
tracked and reported
Log code-level vulnerabilities with file paths, line numbers, and remediation guidance. Track fixes with developers through the portal and generate technical reports.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.
Structure security code reviews with precise findings and developer-friendly tracking
Security code reviews require a different level of precision than network or application-level assessments. Findings need exact file paths, line numbers, and code context to be actionable for developers. Generic vulnerability descriptions are not enough; reviewers must show the vulnerable code, explain the attack vector, and provide concrete remediation guidance with secure code examples. Most pentest platforms treat code review as an afterthought, forcing security teams to document code-level findings in tools designed for infrastructure vulnerabilities.
SecPortal is built to handle security code review engagements with the same structured workflow used for penetration tests and compliance audits. Each finding captures the file path, line number, vulnerable code snippet, severity score, and remediation guidance. Developers access findings through the client portal, where they can see exactly where the issue lives in the codebase, understand the risk, and track their fix through to verification. AI-generated reports produce technical deliverables that speak the language of development teams, not just security auditors.
Code vulnerability categories
Injection Vulnerabilities
SQL injection, command injection, XSS, and template injection findings with exact file paths, line numbers, and vulnerable code snippets.
Authentication and Session Flaws
Hardcoded credentials, weak session management, missing CSRF protections, and insecure token handling identified at the source code level.
Insecure Data Handling
Sensitive data logged in plaintext, unencrypted storage, missing input validation, and improper error handling that leaks internal details.
Business Logic Issues
Race conditions, privilege escalation paths, workflow bypass vulnerabilities, and missing authorisation checks on critical operations.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Known CVEs in third-party libraries and frameworks, with version details, severity scores, and recommended upgrade paths.
Configuration and Secrets
API keys in source code, debug modes enabled in production, overly permissive CORS policies, and insecure default configurations.
The code review engagement workflow
SecPortal structures every code review as a managed engagement with clear phases, assigned reviewers, and tracked deliverables. The workflow ensures that findings are documented consistently, clients receive actionable results, and remediation progress is visible to all stakeholders.
- Create a code review engagement specifying the repository, branch, programming languages, and review scope (full codebase or targeted modules)
- Assign reviewers with expertise in the relevant language and framework to ensure thorough coverage of language-specific vulnerability patterns
- Log findings with precise file paths, line numbers, vulnerable code snippets, and severity ratings using CVSS or custom scales
- Attach proof-of-concept exploits, data flow diagrams, and remediation code samples directly to each finding
- Publish findings to the client portal where developers can review issues, ask clarifying questions, and mark fixes as implemented
- Track remediation status as developers address each finding, with the ability to verify fixes through follow-up review cycles
- Generate AI-powered technical reports with finding summaries, risk prioritisation, and code-specific remediation guidance
Developer collaboration and fix tracking
Developer-Friendly Portal
Developers see findings with file paths, line numbers, and code context, so they can locate and fix issues without back-and-forth emails.
Inline Remediation Guidance
Each finding includes specific fix recommendations with secure code examples, not just generic descriptions of the vulnerability class.
Fix Verification Tracking
Developers mark findings as fixed and attach updated code or commit references. Reviewers verify the fix and update the finding status.
Priority-Based Fix Ordering
Findings are sorted by severity and exploitability, giving development teams a clear order of operations for their remediation sprint.
SecPortal bridges the gap between security reviewers and development teams. By presenting findings with the precision that developers need (file paths, line numbers, code context) and providing a collaborative portal for fix tracking, the platform ensures that code review findings actually get resolved rather than languishing in a PDF that no one reads twice. Whether you are reviewing a monolithic application, a microservices architecture, or a mobile app codebase, SecPortal provides the structure to deliver thorough, actionable code security assessments.
How it works in SecPortal
A streamlined workflow from start to finish.
Set up the review
Create the engagement, define scope (repositories, languages, frameworks), and assign reviewers.
Log code-level findings
Record vulnerabilities with file paths, severity ratings, and detailed remediation guidance for developers.
Track fixes and report
Developers update fix status through the portal. Generate a final technical report with AI assistance.
Deliver better code reviews
From finding to fix, tracked in one place.
No credit card required. Free plan available forever.