Comparison

SecPortal vs Sprinto
compliance automation vs security testing workspace

Sprinto is a cloud-native compliance automation platform built around the Master Compliance Manager (MCM), continuous control monitoring across cloud, identity, HR, code, and SaaS surfaces, integrated Trust Center exposure, and in-built audit support for SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, CSA STAR, and Custom Frameworks. The platform is sold to founders, growth-stage CTOs, mid-market security leaders, and compliance owners who need a fast path to a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit and a continuous monitoring posture across the certification programme. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, native external and authenticated web scanning, code scanning on connected repositories, retesting, findings management with CVSS 3.1 scoring, and the exception register all live inside one workspace. This page is the side-by-side for buyers comparing a compliance automation platform that drives the control catalogue, the evidence layer, and the audit-readiness model to a security testing and remediation workspace that scans, records, reports, and delivers findings.

Get Started Free

No credit card required. Free plan available forever.

Feature	SecPortal	Sprinto
Primary use case	Security testing and remediation workspace with scanning, findings, AI reports, and branded portal on one tenant	Cloud-native compliance automation that drives the Master Compliance Manager (MCM) control catalogue, continuous control monitoring, the Trust Center exposure, and the audit support workflow across the SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, CCPA, and CSA STAR certification programme
Built-in external vulnerability scanning (16 modules)		Sprinto integrates with third-party vulnerability scanners (the buyer provides Nessus, Qualys, AWS Inspector, Detectify, Intruder, similar) as control evidence sources; the platform does not run its own scans
Authenticated web application scanning (DAST)
Code scanning (SAST and SCA via Semgrep) on connected repositories		Sprinto reads code scanning evidence from connected GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket and from third-party SAST/SCA tools as control coverage; does not run SAST or SCA itself
Subdomain enumeration and external attack surface discovery
Domain verification before any external scan (DNS TXT or meta tag)		No external scanning surface to gate
Continuous scheduled scanning cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly)		Continuous control monitoring runs evidence checks on a configured cadence; the cadence is for control checks, not active vulnerability scanning
Engagement model with scope, ROE, and deliverables
Manual finding entry with full editor (for pentest and review findings)		Manual evidence upload against control checks; not a finding editor for technical pentest findings
Findings management with CVSS 3.1 auto-scoring		Risk register entries with custom risk scoring rather than CVSS-scored vulnerability findings
300+ finding templates with remediation guidance		Pre-built control library and policy template library across frameworks rather than vulnerability finding templates
Scanner result import (Nessus, Burp Suite, CSV)		Vulnerability scanner integrations feed control checks; not a generic finding-import surface for engagement work
Encrypted credential vault for authenticated scans (AES-256-GCM)		Stores integration credentials for control monitoring; not a credential vault for active scanning
Retest workflow paired to original finding		Control re-checks on the monitoring cadence rather than a paired-retest workflow on a finding
Exception register with eight-field decision chain		Risk register entries with treatment plans and risk acceptance against control checks rather than a per-finding exception decision chain
Compliance framework templates and control mapping	21 frameworks including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight	Cross-framework support spanning SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, CSA STAR, and Custom Frameworks inside the Master Compliance Manager
AI-powered report generation (executive, technical, remediation)		AI assists with policy drafting and questionnaire automation; not engagement-shaped narrative pentest deliverables
Branded white-label client portal on your subdomain		Trust Center is hosted on the Sprinto domain (configurable to a customer subdomain on enterprise tiers); not a client-portal model for delivering technical pentest findings under your brand
Master Compliance Manager (MCM) for cross-framework control orchestration	Compliance tracking maps findings across 21 framework templates with CSV export
Continuous control monitoring across cloud, identity, HR, code, EDR, SIEM, and SaaS surfaces
Trust Center for prospect and customer exposure	Customer security evidence room workflow on the engagement record; no dedicated public-facing Trust Center
Questionnaire automation (SIG, CAIQ, custom)	Vendor security questionnaire response workflow on the engagement record
In-built audit support and auditor marketplace
Policy template library and policy drafting workflow	AI report generation drafts engagement-shaped deliverables; not a policy library editor
Asset inventory tied to control checks	Engagement scope and verified domain list; not a connected asset inventory across cloud, identity, HR, and SaaS surfaces
HR onboarding and offboarding evidence pulls
Integrated invoicing and Stripe Connect payments for engagements
Activity audit trail with CSV export		Platform audit logs and control history
MFA enforcement on every workspace		SSO and MFA configuration per tenant on paid tiers
Free plan available
Pricing model	Free, Pro, Team	Sales-led annual contract licensing scaled by employee count, framework count, integration footprint, and the audit support tier
Setup time	2 minutes	Integration connection across cloud, identity, HR, code, ticketing, EDR, SIEM, and SaaS surfaces plus control mapping, policy adoption, and audit kickoff
Best fit for	AppSec teams, internal security teams, vulnerability management teams, product security teams, pentest firms, MSSPs, and consultancies that scan, record, report, and deliver findings from one workspace	Founders, growth-stage CTOs, mid-market security leaders, and compliance owners running SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, CCPA, and CSA STAR programmes who need continuous control monitoring and in-built audit support on one platform

SecPortal vs Sprinto: compliance automation vs security testing workspace

Sprinto is a cloud-native compliance automation platform built to drive the cross-framework control catalogue, the continuous control monitoring cadence, the Trust Center exposure, the questionnaire automation pack, and the in-built audit support workflow for a growth-stage or mid-market certification programme. The platform ships Master Compliance Manager (MCM) for cross-framework control orchestration, continuous control monitoring across cloud, identity, HR, code, ticketing, MDM, EDR, and SaaS integrations, the Trust Center for prospect and customer exposure, questionnaire automation across SIG and CAIQ, a policy library and adoption workflow, and an in-built auditor marketplace for SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, CSA STAR, and Custom Frameworks. The buyer is a founder, a growth-stage CTO, a mid-market security leader, or a compliance owner whose primary job is to get to a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit, build a continuous monitoring posture, and surface the certification status to prospects through a Trust Center.

SecPortal is a different category. SecPortal is a security testing and remediation workspace that carries scoped engagements, manual and scanner-driven findings, AI-generated reports, a branded client portal, the exception register, and an audit trail all on one tenant. The buyer is an AppSec team, an internal security team, a vulnerability management team, a product security team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a security consultancy whose work covers scanning, finding, reporting, and delivering to clients, business units, or auditors. If you are comparing a compliance automation platform that runs the control catalogue, the continuous monitoring cadence, and the Trust Center exposure to a security testing workspace that scans, records, reports, and ships findings, this page is the side-by-side. The adjacent comparisons buyers in the GRC and compliance automation category often evaluate alongside are SecPortal vs Vanta, SecPortal vs Drata, SecPortal vs Secureframe, SecPortal vs Thoropass, and SecPortal vs Hyperproof.

Where Sprinto stops for security testing, finding, and delivery work

These are not Sprinto-specific criticisms; they are properties of a compliance automation platform when you compare it to running scoped engagements, manual reviews, external and authenticated web scanning, code scanning, AI report writing, and branded delivery on a single workspace.

Built as a compliance automation platform, not a security testing workspace

Sprinto is a cloud-native compliance automation platform organised around the Master Compliance Manager (MCM) for the cross-framework control catalogue, continuous control monitoring across cloud, identity, HR, code, and SaaS surfaces, the integrated Trust Center for prospect and customer exposure, questionnaire automation across SIG and CAIQ, policy adoption workflows, and in-built audit support for SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, CSA STAR, and Custom Frameworks. The platform is sold to founders, growth-stage CTOs, mid-market security leaders, and compliance owners who need a fast path to a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit and a continuous monitoring posture across the certification programme. SecPortal is a different shape: scoped engagements, manual finding entry, AI report generation, branded client portal, native external and authenticated web scanning, code scanning on connected repositories, retesting, findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, and the exception register all live inside one workspace.

No active vulnerability scanning surface

Sprinto does not run its own external attack surface scan, authenticated DAST against a logged-in application, or SAST and SCA on connected repositories. The platform reads vulnerability scanner output from third-party tools (Nessus, Qualys, AWS Inspector, Detectify, Intruder, similar) as control evidence sources rather than running the scans itself. If the security team needs to scan a perimeter, run a logged-in DAST pass, or run SAST plus SCA against a repository as part of the security testing programme, that work happens in a separate platform that feeds Sprinto control evidence afterwards. SecPortal runs 16 external scanner modules across DNS, TLS, ports, headers, technology, subdomain enumeration, path probing, and CVE matching on any verified domain, 17 authenticated web scanner modules against any logged-in target, and Semgrep-powered SAST plus dependency analysis on repositories connected by GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth.

No engagement, scope, or scoped deliverable model

Sprinto is organised around the control check, the framework programme, the policy adoption, the Trust Center exposure, and the audit support workflow. There is no scoped engagement record with a kickoff, a defined target list, rules of engagement, a final report, and a closure date. If the work being shipped is a penetration test, a vulnerability assessment, an external attack surface programme, an AppSec code review, a third-party security review, or a client-billable security assessment with a contract scope and a deliverable, Sprinto does not carry that record. SecPortal does, on the same workspace as the scanner stack, the AI report generator, and the branded client portal.

No branded client portal for technical findings delivery

Sprinto produces the Trust Center, the questionnaire response pack, the audit-ready evidence pack, and the policy adoption workspace under a Sprinto-hosted domain (with configurable customer subdomain for the Trust Center on enterprise tiers). There is no branded client portal on a tenant subdomain that delivers technical pentest findings, retest cycles, remediation conversations, and AI-generated reports under the security team or consultancy brand. SecPortal serves a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain so every finding, retest, remediation thread, and report download lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.

No native pentest, manual finding, or narrative report workflow

Sprinto drafts policy adoption copy, runs continuous control monitoring evidence pulls, automates questionnaire responses across SIG and CAIQ, builds the Trust Center exposure, and renders the audit-ready evidence pack the auditor reads. It does not draft narrative pentest reports, accept manual finding entry from a tester or reviewer with full evidence and CVSS vector parsing, or generate executive summaries and remediation roadmaps that go to a board, a client, or an application owner. SecPortal supports manual finding entry with a full editor, drafts executive, technical, and remediation deliverables from the live findings record with Claude, and pairs every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit.

Sales-led pricing scaled to compliance programme scope

Sprinto pricing is sales-led and scaled by employee count, framework count, the integration footprint across cloud, identity, HR, code, ticketing, EDR, SIEM, and SaaS surfaces, and the audit support tier. Annual contract floors fit mid-market and growth-stage procurement rather than pure self-service onboarding. SecPortal pricing is published on the website with a free plan, monthly Pro and Team tiers, and no annual contract floor for the Pro and Team tiers.

How a compliance automation platform and a security testing workspace see the same problem differently

Compliance automation is a useful category framing for the cross-framework control catalogue, the continuous monitoring cadence, and the Trust Center exposure. The buyer should be clear-eyed about what a compliance automation platform gives you and where the engagement, scan, manual finding, and delivery workflow has to go instead. The contrast below is between a compliance automation platform that derives value from driving the control catalogue and continuous monitoring across organisational systems and a security testing workspace that holds the engagement record on the tenant where the operators work.

Compliance automation runs the control catalogue and the continuous monitoring posture

Sprinto, Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Thoropass, Strike Graph, and similar compliance automation platforms start from the assumption that the framework catalogue, the continuous control monitoring cadence, and the audit-ready evidence pack are the assets of record. The economic value comes from giving the compliance owner a single tenant where integrations across cloud, identity, HR, code, ticketing, EDR, SIEM, and SaaS surfaces feed control checks, policies adopt and acknowledge, questionnaires answer themselves from the same record, the Trust Center exposes the posture to prospects, and the audit support workflow walks fieldwork through the in-built auditor relationship. The product is the compliance automation layer that sits on top of the rest of the security stack.

A security testing and remediation workspace owns the finding from scan to closure

SecPortal does not assume that a compliance automation platform is the right shape for every kind of security work. The workspace runs scoped engagements, supports manual finding entry from a tester or reviewer, runs its own external and authenticated web scanning plus code scanning on connected repositories, calibrates severity through CVSS 3.1 with environmental adjustment, captures the exception register on the same record as the finding, ships AI-generated executive, technical, and remediation deliverables, and serves the report and the live findings through a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain. The same record holds for a scoped pentest, a continuous vulnerability assessment, an AppSec code review, a third-party security review, and an external attack surface programme.

Most growth-stage and mid-market security programmes run both, with each platform doing what it was built for

The honest framing is that a compliance automation platform and a security testing workspace solve adjacent problems. Sprinto carries the cross-framework control catalogue, the continuous monitoring cadence, the Trust Center exposure, the questionnaire automation, and the in-built audit support across the certification programme. SecPortal carries the engagement, scan, finding, exception, retest, and report record that produces the technical security evidence Sprinto surfaces to auditors against a control. The two coexist: compliance owners run on the framework catalogue inside Sprinto, the security testing team runs on the engagement record inside SecPortal, and the same activity log walks back from the audit observation period to the underlying technical work.

Who each platform is the right fit for

Sprinto and SecPortal solve adjacent problems for different buyers. The honest answer is that the right tool depends on whether the work is growth-stage or mid-market compliance automation across the control catalogue, the continuous monitoring cadence, the Trust Center exposure, the questionnaire automation pack, and the in-built audit support workflow or scoped engagements, manual review, scanning, AI reporting, and branded delivery on one workspace. Many growth-stage and mid-market security programmes run both, with Sprinto carrying the compliance automation layer and SecPortal carrying the engagement, finding, and delivery record beside it.

Sprinto fits growth-stage and mid-market compliance owners going through a first certification cycle

If you are a founder, a growth-stage CTO, a mid-market security leader, or a compliance owner whose primary job is to get to a first SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 certification and then to a continuous monitoring posture across the certification programme, the asset of record is the control catalogue inside the Master Compliance Manager, the bottleneck is coordinating integration setup, policy adoption, control check cadence, Trust Center exposure, questionnaire automation, and audit support across the certification cycle, and the team needs a platform that holds MCM, continuous control monitoring, the Trust Center, questionnaire automation, the policy library, and the in-built auditor marketplace on one tenant, Sprinto was built for that compliance automation shape. The buyer assumption is one cloud-native compliance automation platform that drives the certification programme end to end.

SecPortal fits security teams that scan, find, report, and deliver

If you are an AppSec team, an internal security team, a product security team, a vulnerability management team, a penetration testing firm, an MSSP, or a security consultancy whose work covers scoped engagements, manual finding entry, external perimeter scanning, authenticated web testing, code scanning, AI-generated reporting, and branded delivery, SecPortal carries that lifecycle on one tenant. Findings, scans, retests, exception decisions, evidence, and the audit trail all live on the engagement record rather than scattered across a compliance automation console, a separate scanner stack, a separate report generator, and a separate portal.

Many growth-stage and mid-market programmes run both side by side

A growth-stage or mid-market organisation can keep Sprinto for the control catalogue, the continuous control monitoring posture, the Trust Center, the questionnaire automation, the policy adoption workflow, and the in-built audit support and use SecPortal for the engagement record that holds scoped pentests, vulnerability assessments, AppSec code reviews, external attack surface programmes, and the findings the technical team produces. Sprinto surfaces the compliance posture to the audit committee, the prospect, and the external auditor; the SecPortal client portal serves the technical findings, retest cycles, and report downloads to clients, business units, or internal stakeholders under your subdomain.

How Sprinto sits relative to Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Thoropass, and Hyperproof

Buyers comparing compliance automation platforms typically shortlist Sprinto alongside Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Thoropass in the same category and compare those platforms against compliance operations platforms like Hyperproof and enterprise IRM suites like OneTrust. The contrast below explains how Sprinto sits relative to those adjacent platforms, and where SecPortal sits relative to all of them.

Sprinto versus Vanta and Drata

Sprinto sits in the same compliance-automation category as Vanta and Drata, with overlapping framework coverage across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and NIST CSF, overlapping continuous control monitoring approaches, and overlapping Trust Center models. Buyers comparing the three usually weigh ergonomics on the Master Compliance Manager (Sprinto), the Adaptive Automation engine (Drata), and the Trust Center plus Questionnaire Automation maturity (Vanta) for their employee count, integration footprint, and audit-support preference. The compliance-automation category framing is consistent across all three.

Sprinto versus Secureframe and Thoropass

Sprinto, Secureframe, and Thoropass differ on policy authoring tooling, audit-labour bundling, and Custom Frameworks support. Secureframe is built around Comply AI policy drafting and Custom Frameworks. Thoropass bundles in-house audit labour for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, HITRUST, NIST CSF, CMMC, and SOX. Sprinto runs an in-built auditor marketplace and continuous control monitoring on the same tenant. All three sit in the compliance-automation category and the buyer assumption is the same.

Where SecPortal sits relative to all of them

SecPortal is not a compliance automation platform and does not pretend to replace one. SecPortal sits next to compliance automation as the security testing and delivery workspace where scoped pentest findings, manual reviewer findings, external perimeter scan output, authenticated web DAST output, SAST and SCA output from connected repositories, AI-generated reports, the exception register, and the branded client portal all live on one tenant. If Sprinto is the right answer for the control-evidence, continuous-monitoring, Trust-Center, questionnaire-automation, and audit-support layer, the security testing workspace is still the right answer for the engagement, finding, and delivery work that sits beside it.

Where the evidence comes from in each platform

Sprinto and SecPortal both produce evidence an auditor or a buyer reads, but the evidence source is different. Sprinto reads continuous control monitoring output and manual uploads against control checks inside MCM. SecPortal runs scans, accepts manual finding entry, and holds the engagement record from kickoff to closure. The contrast matters when the auditor or the business unit asks for the technical security testing evidence behind a control, not just the configuration state of an organisational system or the policy adoption status of a control owner.

Sprinto supplies control-level evidence from continuous control monitoring and manual uploads

The Sprinto value proposition is that compliance becomes a continuous monitoring posture rather than a once-a-year scramble. The platform connects integrations across cloud accounts, identity providers, HR systems, MDM, ticketing, code repositories, security testing tools, and SaaS surfaces, runs continuous control checks against the Master Compliance Manager catalogue on a configured cadence, accepts manual evidence uploads against control checks, and renders the resulting evidence into an audit-ready pack inside the in-built audit support workflow. The right question is not whether that evidence layer is useful (it is), but whether it covers the technical security testing record that drives findings, retests, and remediation conversations on a scoped engagement.

SecPortal supplies finding-level evidence from the engagement record

The SecPortal value proposition is that the technical security work has a single record that walks from the scoped engagement to the scan, to the finding, to the exception decision, to the retest, to the report, and to the closure event. CVSS 3.1 vectors, severity, evidence, owner, remediation status, retest pairing, and exception rationale all sit on the same record. When an auditor reads the security testing evidence for an observation period, the record reconstructs itself rather than getting reassembled from chat threads and ad hoc PDFs.

Where SecPortal sits next to Sprinto rather than inside the same category

SecPortal is not a compliance automation platform and does not pretend to replace one. SecPortal sits next to a compliance automation platform as the security testing and delivery workspace where scoped pentest findings, manual reviewer findings, external perimeter scan output, authenticated web DAST output, SAST and SCA output from connected repositories, AI-generated reports, the exception register, and the branded client portal all live on one tenant. If Sprinto is the right answer for the control-evidence layer, the security testing workspace is still the right answer for the engagement, finding, and delivery work that sits beside it.

Control checks vs engagement findings: two different operating models

Sprinto organises work around control checks, policy adoption, Trust Center claims, and audit support timelines. SecPortal organises work around scoped engagements and the findings they produce. Both operating models feed the audit observation period, but they observe different surfaces and produce different evidence shapes.

Sprinto Master Compliance Manager organises work around the control check

MCM treats every control under every framework as a check with an integration source, a continuous monitoring cadence, an owner, an evidence trail, and a cross-framework mapping. Policies treat every framework requirement as a document with a draft, an adoption acknowledgement, a review cadence, and an owner. The Trust Center treats every certification claim as an asset with a renewal date, a public exposure, and a customer-facing description. The unit of work is the control check, the policy, or the certification claim; the unit of evidence is the integration pull or the manual upload against a control; the cadence is the continuous monitoring schedule.

SecPortal organises work around the engagement and the finding

The unit of work in SecPortal is the engagement, scoped to a client or business unit with a kickoff, a target list, rules of engagement, deliverables, and a closure date. The unit of evidence is the scan execution and the finding it produced (a finding carries CVSS 3.1 vector, severity, asset, evidence, owner, remediation status, retest pairing, and exception rationale on the same record). The cadence is the engagement and any continuous monitoring schedule layered over the engagement (daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly). Findings map to controls via the compliance tracking layer across 21 framework templates, so the audit-side reader can walk from a control to the finding that produced the underlying technical evidence.

The two operating models observe different layers of the same posture

Sprinto Master Compliance Manager and SecPortal findings management both ladder up to the audit observation period. Sprinto tells you whether the control state across the organisation matches the framework expectation on the continuous monitoring cadence and routes the control owner to the next evidence task. SecPortal tells you whether the technical state of an asset, an application, or a repository matches the security testing expectation and routes the finding owner to the next remediation, retest, or exception decision. Both layers feed the audit observation period: Sprinto gives the auditor the control coverage view; SecPortal gives the auditor the underlying technical evidence the control coverage view points at.

Trust Center vs branded client portal: two delivery surfaces

Sprinto markets the Trust Center as the public-facing exposure of the compliance programme to prospects and customers. SecPortal markets the branded client portal as the tenant-subdomain workspace where technical findings, retests, and engagement reports get delivered to clients, business units, and internal stakeholders. The two surfaces serve different audiences with different shapes and sit beside each other rather than against each other.

Sprinto Trust Center exposes the compliance posture to prospects and customers

The Sprinto Trust Center is a public-facing exposure of the compliance programme. The Trust Center renders the certification status, the policy library, the security posture summary, and the questionnaire response pack on a Sprinto-hosted domain (configurable to a customer subdomain on enterprise tiers). The asset of the Trust Center is the certification claim and the policy library; the audience is the prospect, the customer security reviewer, and the procurement team running due diligence. The platform integrates the Trust Center with the Master Compliance Manager so the public exposure reflects the live control state.

SecPortal client portal serves technical findings to clients and business units

The SecPortal client portal is a tenant-subdomain workspace where clients, business units, or internal stakeholders see the live findings list, the retest threads, the AI-generated executive and technical reports, the remediation conversations, and the engagement deliverables under your brand. The asset of the client portal is the finding and the engagement deliverable; the audience is the application owner, the engineering team, the security operator, the consulting client, and the internal stakeholder reading remediation status. The portal sits on a tenant subdomain so the technical delivery lives under your name rather than under a vendor name.

Different audiences, different shapes, same activity-log substrate

A Trust Center and a client portal serve different audiences with different shapes. The Trust Center is a public-facing certification and policy exposure for prospects. The client portal is a tenant-subdomain delivery workspace for technical findings, retests, and engagement reports. The two surfaces sit beside each other rather than against each other. Many organisations operate both: Sprinto exposes the certification status to prospects, the SecPortal client portal delivers the technical findings to application owners and clients, and both surfaces feed the audit-side reader the evidence that reconstructs the observation period.

Continuous control monitoring vs continuous scan monitoring: two cadences

Sprinto promotes continuous control monitoring as the differentiator that keeps the compliance posture live across the certification cycle. SecPortal runs continuous scan monitoring on a configured cadence so external, authenticated, and code scanning evidence stays current against the engagement scope. The pipelines run on different cadences and read different surfaces, and both feed the audit observation period.

Sprinto continuous control monitoring runs evidence checks on a configured cadence

Sprinto continuous control monitoring pulls evidence from integrated systems against MCM control checks on a configured cadence (typically daily for high-cadence checks, weekly or monthly for lower-cadence checks) so the compliance posture reflects the live system state rather than a snapshot at audit time. Integrations cover cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), identity (Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, Auth0), HR (Workday, BambooHR, Rippling, Justworks), MDM (Jamf, Kandji, Intune, JumpCloud), code (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps), ticketing (Jira, Asana, ClickUp), endpoint and EDR (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne), and SaaS surfaces. The result is a continuous compliance evidence trail that feeds the audit-ready evidence pack during the examination period.

SecPortal continuous monitoring runs scan executions on a configured cadence

SecPortal continuous monitoring runs external scans, authenticated scans, or code scans on a configured cadence (daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly) against an engagement scope. Each scan execution lands on the engagement record as evidence, the resulting findings flow into findings management with CVSS 3.1 vector parsing, and the scan history feeds the audit observation period as the underlying record behind a security testing assertion. The cadence is calibrated to the asset criticality, the regulatory expectation, and the engagement model.

The two monitoring pipelines are complementary, not competing

Continuous control monitoring answers the question of whether the configuration state of an enterprise system matches a control expectation. Continuous scan monitoring answers the question of whether the technical state of an asset, an application, or a repository matches a security testing expectation. The audit-side stakeholder reads both: the continuous control evidence under the Master Compliance Manager and the technical evidence under findings management. If your evaluation is whether the platform that drives continuous control monitoring across enterprise systems is the right shape for engagement and finding work, the answer is that the two pipelines sit beside each other rather than replace each other.

How findings, scans, and reports get into each platform

Sprinto is downstream of the security testing programme: the platform reads control evidence from integration pulls and from manual uploads against control checks and surfaces the resulting compliance state. The scanning, the manual pentest finding, and the narrative report happen elsewhere. SecPortal runs scanning, finding entry, and reporting inside the same workspace as the engagement.

The external scanning feature runs 16 modules covering SSL, headers, DNS, ports, subdomains, technology fingerprinting, and CVE correlation. The authenticated scanning feature adds DAST behind stored credentials so issues that only surface inside an authenticated session do not slip past anonymous testing. The code scanning feature runs Semgrep-powered SAST and dependency auditing against repositories connected by OAuth from GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. The findings management feature holds the consolidated record with CVSS 3.1 scoring, evidence, owner, and remediation status. The AI reports feature drafts the executive and technical narratives the client or auditor receives.

Transparent pricing, no procurement cycle

SecPortal pricing is published on the website and self-service from sign-up. There is no annual contract floor on the Pro or Team tiers, no per-employee licensing model scaled to the compliance programme footprint, and no sales call required before you can run a real engagement.

SecPortal Free

Free forever

1 user, 3 clients, 2 engagements per client, 3 AI credits, 6 core scan modules.

SecPortal Pro

From $149/month

All scan modules, 100 clients, 25 AI credits/month, branded client portal, invoicing, compliance tracking.

SecPortal Team

From $299/month

Up to 5 users, 75 AI credits/month, team management, activity audit trail with CSV export, MFA enforcement.

Why security teams pick SecPortal alongside or instead of Sprinto

Run scoped engagements with a kickoff, deliverables, retests, and a final invoice on one record rather than a control check queue, a policy adoption task list, and an audit support timeline inside a compliance automation console
Scan the perimeter with 16 external modules, run authenticated DAST with 17 web modules, and run SAST plus SCA on connected repositories from inside the workspace
Generate executive, technical, and remediation deliverables with Claude from the live findings record
Enter manual findings from a tester, reviewer, or third-party report into the same record the scanners feed
Deliver findings through a branded client portal on a tenant subdomain instead of a Sprinto-hosted Trust Center
Pair every retest to the original finding so the closure record holds up under audit
Document CVSS, EPSS, KEV, asset tier, exposure, and compensating controls on the engagement record so prioritisation is defensible to a board, an auditor, or an application owner
Capture the exception register on the same record as the finding with linked finding, severity, compensating controls, residual likelihood, residual impact, business rationale, expiry, and review cadence
Map findings across 21 framework templates including OWASP, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, MITRE ATT&CK, DORA, NIS2, CIS Controls, and Essential Eight
Store privileged scan credentials encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM and rotate them through the in-product credential vault
Invoice clients or business units directly from the engagement record through Stripe Connect
Start on the free plan and upgrade without a sales call, an employee-count audit, a framework-count audit, or an annual contract floor for the published tiers

When the work is scanning, finding, reporting, and delivering, not compliance automation

Run scoped engagements, generate AI reports, and ship findings through a branded portal on one workspace. The compliance automation platform sits alongside, not above. Start free.